New User / Register || Book Marks || Annual Subscription || Feed Back ||
Login: Stay
|| Forget Password ||
     
TMI - Tax Management India. Com  

Recent Discussionss:

BRANCH TRANSFER SALE Vat on Freight E1 transaction F Form - Capital Goods C Form and applicability rules REFUND OF INPUT CREDIT IS SALES TAX / VAT APPLICABLE FOR TRANSPORTERS. VAT Billing and Stock transfer Franchise fee Service tax RCM

Central Excise Case Laws

 

Advanced Search options


Filter -


 
Showing 1021 to 1035 of 50914 Records

    2013 (12) TMI 1289 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    GAJLAXMI STEEL PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL, EXCISE

    Benefit of Cenvat credit denied as per Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rule, 2002 - Default persisted more than 30 days Waiver of Pre-deposit Held that:- Following Manjunatha Industries Versus CCE [2013 (4) TMI 534 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] - Cenvat C ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1288 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    M/s JAI HIND INDUSTRIES LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CEN. EXCISE

    Undervaluation of goods Held that:- From the debit notes, it is evident that the charge of undervaluation is in respect of the AC Compressor which the appellant has manufactured and supplied - it is the appellant who has charged for the drawings an ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1287 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    M/s RV REFRACTORIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, TIRUCHIRAPALLI

    Credit on calcium silica boards, anchors, electrodes availed - Goods to be treated as capital goods or finished goods Waiver of Pre-deposit Held that:- The items were cleared with the final product for using them in the kiln/furnace - they have p ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1286 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAIPUR Versus BAJRANG METALLIC & POWER PVT. LTD.

    Waiver of penalty and interest - Clandestine removal of excisable goods - Held that:- When the issue was brought out, respondent paid duty payable on the goods along with interest and 25% of the duty amount as penalty immediately on issue of the show ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1285 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    TURBHE CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., BELAPUR

    Rejection of refund claim - Bar of limitation - Held that:- Appellant cleared the goods under the excise invoices showing appropriate payment of duty. The claim of the appellant is that the appellants are job workers and paying duty at the value at w ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1284 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    DIAMOND ENTERTAINMENT TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD. Versus CCE., MEERUT-II

    Duty demand - Exemption of duty - Benefit of Notification No. 50/2003-C.E. - Held that:- exemption should be available to the appellants because the factory premises is within the specified Khasra numbers and only a drainage on the boundary of their ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1283 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADURAI Versus KV. TEXTILES

    Demand of duty - Held that:- orders have been passed by the original authority and the lower appellate authority subsequent to the order of remand by the Tribunal, which was not challenged by the department. The lower appellate authority has confirme ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1282 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, TRICHY Versus PSP STEELS (P) LTD.

    Classification of goods - Classification under Heading 8427 or under 8431.20 - Held that:- impugned goods are attachments for back hoe and loader, which is classifiable under Heading 8427,which covers fork lift trucks and other works trucks fitted wi ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1280 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s SA. Freshners Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE, New Delhi

    Duty liability as per Rule 8 of Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008 Waiver of Pre-deposit Held that:- Rule 8 of Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1242 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

    Commissioner Central Excise Commissionerate, Ludhiana Versus M/s Hawkins Cookers Ltd. Hoshiarpur

    Penalty set aside payment of duty on parts of pressure cookers Held that:- The reasoning given by the Tribunal cannot be said to be illegal or unwarranted - The assessee was entitled to exemption by virtue of notification dated 1.3.2002 - The not ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1241 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

    M/s Mittal Alloys, Ludhiana Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh

    Abatement claim as per Rule 96ZO(3) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 due to closure of furnace Failure to comply with the Obligations under the rule Held that:- Omission of a Rule as opposed to a mere repeal or deletion, does not confer legitimacy o ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1240 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

    Noon Homes and Resorts (P) Ltd. Versus CESTAT

    Jurisdiction of Tribunal - Whether the learned Tribunal was justified in recording the finding on merits while dealing with an application for dispensation of pre-deposit Held that:- The Tribunal in exceptional cases can assess the prima facie case ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1239 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

    M/s KUMAR'S COTEX LTD Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS

    Liability to pre-deposit the duty u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 Held that:- A plain reading of the provision shows that pre-deposit is not mandatory in all appeals filed under Section 35B of the Act, but in certain appeals specified there ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1238 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

    PURSHOTAM INDUSTRIES LTD Versus THE CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER

    Extended period of limitation Held that:- The Court recorded that the classification list had been approved after carrying out verification - one consignment in transit was seized when the goods were found containing labels of foreign brand - RT-12 ......

    2013 (12) TMI 1237 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

    M/s CYNOSURE ENTERPRISES LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE HYDERABAD & ANR

    Vacancy due to retirement in the Tribunal Stay application could not be taken up Held that:- There was a vacancy for considerable time in the Tribunal on account of absence of a technical member and it was not functioning till very recently for t ......

   
 
 
 

 

what is new what is new

UpdatesKnowledge SharingSubscription CommunicationNewslettersMore Options



Go to Mobile Website Go To Top
- -
© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.