New User / Register | Bookmarks | Annual Subscription | Feedback |
Login: Stay
| Forget Password |
           
TMI - Tax Management India. Com  

Recent Discussionss:

SERVICE TAX ON LIQUIDATED DAMAGES Excise duty liabilities on one FG use in other FG within the Factory Export Without Central Excise registration Excise Duty on Tooling developed by Supplier SERIES OF INVOICES service tax credit on commission service received 1% interest penalty when cenvat credit reversed without utilising Treatment of Share Issue Expenses in realtion to increased Authroised Capital Service Tax & Vat Bot charged on Window 8.1 Professional purchased transportation of goods by railway

Central Excise Case Laws

 

Advanced Search options


Filter -


 
Showing 16 to 30 of 52087 Records

    2014 (8) TMI 885 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s. Barara Cements Co. Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi III

    Concessional rate of duty provided under notification No. 24/91-CE dated 25.7.91 - Assesee filed classification list claiming the effective rate of duties in terms of notification No. 1/93-CE dated 28.2.93 - Held that:- After enjoying the benefit of ......

    2014 (8) TMI 884 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s UP FILAMENT (INDIA) Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GHAZIABAD

    Valuation of the Poly Propylene Multi Filament Yarn, consumed captively in the manufacture of Narrow Woven Fabrics - Held that:- Revenue entertained a view that the said yarn should be assessed to duty in terms of provisions of Rule 8 of the Central ......

    2014 (8) TMI 883 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

    M/s Tranapek Industries Ltd. Versus CCE&ST., Vadodara I

    Denial of cenvat credit - Rent-a-cab operator Service and Outdoor Catering Services - Held that:- credit of Outdoor Catering (Canteen) Services is concerned, appellant has reversed a credit if ₹ 1,34,529 - In view of the order in the case of M/ ......

    2014 (8) TMI 882 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    M/s VENUGOPAL FOODS PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

    Manufacture of sugar syrup - captive consumption in manufacturing of final product - marketability - Held that:- In an identical matter involving dutiability of sugar syrup, in the case of Shiv Shakti Processed Foods Vs. Commissioner of Central Excis ......

    2014 (8) TMI 881 - CESTAT KOLKATA

    M/s Exide Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Kol. III

    Waiver of predeposit of cenvat credit - written off of inputs / stock - shortage in stock - Held that:- Demand has been confirmed on the ground that even though the credit had been availed on the inputs, but the same were not used in or in relation t ......

    2014 (8) TMI 852 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

    Praveen Chandra Versus Commissioner of Central Excise And Another

    Maintainability of appeal - Delay caused in making pre deposit - Held that:- Appellant submitted that the amount of ₹ 5 lacs as directed by the Tribunal vide order dated 24.2.2012 as pre-deposit for hearing of the appeal was deposited on 13/14. ......

    2014 (8) TMI 851 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s. Bhushan Steel & Strips Ltd. Versus CCE., Ghaziabad

    Clandestine removal and under valuation - private records - presumption - whether the findings of clandestine removal or under valuation can be upheld on the basis of the entries made in such private records. - it is the contention of the Revenue t ......

    2014 (8) TMI 850 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

    M/s EXECHON Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VADODARA-I

    Denial of CENVAT credit - rent a cab service - Held that:- major amount of CENVAT Credit (Rs.50,000/-) pertains to rent-a-cab services prior to April 2011. Admissibility of CENVAT Credit of rent-a-cab services prior to April 2011 has been favourably ......

    2014 (8) TMI 849 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, TRICHY Versus M/s CHETTINAD CEMENT CORPORATION LTD

    Denial of CENVAT Credit - credit on inputs namely explosives, ammonium nitrate and detonators etc., used in the mines outside the factory premises - Held that:- mines are situated 40 kms away from the factory. He relied upon the decision of the Honbl ......

    2014 (8) TMI 848 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

    M/s. Diamond Power Infrastructure Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & ST., Vadodara

    Delay in filing of rebate claims - Bar of limitation - Held that:- As per the provisions contained in Section 35B (1) read with proviso (b) of the Section, appellate Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear and decide the appeals against the order ......

    2014 (8) TMI 816 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

    M/s Sangam Prints Pvt. Ltd., Shri Suresh Agarwal, Shri Brij Mohan Agarwal, M/s Neha Prints Versus CCE Surat-II

    Clandestine removal of goods - Whether the adjudicating authority is correct in confirming the demand raised against the main appellant and imposing penalties on the main appellant as well as other individuals on the charge of clandestine removal of ......

    2014 (8) TMI 815 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s. Krishna Engineering Works Versus CCE, Ludhiana

    Waiver of pre-deposit of penalty - suppression or mis-statement of fact - Held that:- Duty for Dec. 07 amounting to ₹ 2905658/- was paid by 5.1.2008 except for an amount of ₹ 495617/- out of which ₹ 487872/- was paid on 11.2.2008 an ......

    2014 (8) TMI 814 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

    M/s Hitachi Home & Life Solutions India Ltd. Versus CCE Ahmedabad-III

    Eligibility to avail CENVAT Credit - Repairs & maintenance services - Credit denied on the ground that the maintenance and repair services provided by authorized dealers/ franchisees during the warranty period of the product manufactured by the appel ......

    2014 (8) TMI 813 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s. Alcome Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE. &S. T., Jaipur-I

    Modification of stay order - Waiver of pre deposit - certain documents relied upon by the adjudicating authority were not provided to assessee - Violation of principle of natural justice - Held that:- Number of personal hearing dates were fixed by th ......

    2014 (8) TMI 812 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s GURDAYAL SHYAMLAL PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

    Exemption under Notification No.40/1995-CE - appellant in their padding process had also used Urea Formaldehyde, Copper Sulphate, Tinopal and Blue Acid Violet - penalty under Rule 173Q (1) - Held that:- Notification No.40/1995-CE exempts "the cotton ......

   
 
 
 

 

what is new what is new

UpdatesKnowledge SharingSubscription CommunicationNewslettersMore Options




Quick Links: | Acts and Rules | Notifications | Circulars | Schedules | Tariff | Forms | Case Laws | Manuals |
| Home | About us | Contact us | Feed Back | Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Members | |
Go to Mobile Website Go To Top
© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.