|| New User || My profile || My Book Marks || SMS Services || Annual Subscription || Lost Password ||
Stay
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Payment of commission to relatives for the services rendered by them for promoting sales. - genuineness of commission established - deduction allowed - HC Rejection of the application for registration – Manufacture of cigarettes - No condition regarding issue of licence under IRDA Act by Ministry of Commerce and Industry, before the issue of Central excise registration certificate - refusal of registration is incorrect - Tri Penalty u/s 78 - Changeability of service tax on rent income classifiable under the category of Renting of Immovable Property. - penalty imposed set aside. - Tri Construction of complex - several quarters - different buildings in the same compound. - None of the buildings had more than 12 flats in each building - Prima facie case in favor of assessee - pre deposit waived. - Tri Retreading of old tyres - Maintenance and Repair service - benefit of Notification No. 12/2003-S.T., dated 20-6-2003 - prima facie case is against the assessee - stay granted partly. - Tri Condonation of delay in filing the appeal - assessee is not a company placed with experts advising - Assessee is only an individual which must be appreciated - Delay condoned - Tri Grossing up of the expenditure with TDS amount for claiming deduction - Non reimbursable tax paid to Master Cards/Visa Cards included under the head “Operating Expenses“ - Claim allowed - Tri It is not open to the Revenue to accept a judgement in the case of an assessee and challenge its correctness in the case of any other assessee without just cause. - Tri Income u/s 2(24) - exercising of voting rights in a particular fashion - to exercise voting rights is not the business of the assessee. - The receipt was not of recurring in nature - not taxable - Tri Wrong accounting entry - inadvertent mistake, merely an accounting entry which is subsequently corrected and explained cannot fasten the assessee with tax liability by assuming it to be an income whereas in realty the amount was by way of advance/ deposit. - Tri Transfer of right to use the goods - Exigible to sales tax -assessee(s) have not produced any document/agreement to show that the assessee(s) retained possession and control over the Cinematographic equipments leased out. - Levy of tax upheld - HC Interstate sale or not - CST - passive infrastructure provider - The fact that the goods purchased by the petitioners were neither sold nor used in the manufacture of goods for re-sale does not constitute violation of the C forms. - HC Cross-objections filed before Commissioner (Appeals) against service tax demand - whether be treated as an appeal filled? - Held No - Tri Exemption under Notification No.6/2002 to the goods manufactured at site of the construction for use in the construction work at such site and the goods supplied for use by the Railways, cannot be denied. - Tri Maintainability of settlement application – Despite the assessee informing the Commissioner, that it had paid the filing fee and would file the settlement application within a week, the Commissioner proceeded to pass an order in utter haste. - HC Recovery of service tax while appeal is pending before tribunal - recovery notice published in Daily News Paper ‘Dainik Bhaskar’ dated 28-1-2012 - writ petition dismissed. - HC First appellate authority rejected the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit of 25% - the appellant is directed to deposit 25% of the service tax liability confirmed by the adjudicating authority. - Tri If the goods were not intercepted, the same would have been cleared without claiming the ownership as the actual owner of the goods viz. digital cameras and wrist watches. Therefore, the goods are liable for confiscation - Tri    Left Stop Right
Case Laws

 

Advanced Search options


Filter -


 
Wealth tax
Showing 1 to 15 of 3291 Records

    2013 (5) TMI 262 - ITAT AMRITSAR

    Sh. Jaswinder Singh Versus The Wealth Tax Officer, Jalandhar

    Levy of Wealth tax on agricultural land - Reopening of assessment - Held that:- Levy of wealth tax on agricultural land situated in urban areas or within specified distance of municipal limit has been decided in the case of Tara Singh vs. DCWT (2005 ......

    2013 (5) TMI 61 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

    R. L. Sharma Versus Commissioner, Income Tax/Wealth Tax And Others

    Waiver application u/s 31(2A) of the Wealth Tax Act disallowed - Held that:- It can safely be held that the assessee has co-operated in the assessment proceedings & the business of the assessee has almost been shut down and the assessee is highly in ......

    2013 (4) TMI 587 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

    Smt. Rekha Kesarwani And 19 Others Versus Deputy Commissioner of Wealth Tax

    Assessment orders illegal or without jurisdiction or null and void as a wrong section finds mention in the impugned assessment orders - Held that:- As from the photostat copies of the impugned assessment orders and challans it appears that there is o ......

    2013 (4) TMI 152 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

    M/S Arun Kumar Swarup & Sons Versus Commissioner of Wealth Tax

    Co-owners - Valuation as per Rule 1-BB of Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 - valuations of residential house, kitchen, servants' quarters, garages, godown and cowshed at Sukhbir Sinha Park - Held that:- In view of the decision of Apex Court in the case of Comm ......

    2013 (4) TMI 50 - KERALA HIGH COURT

    THE COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. Versus ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. KOLLAM.

    Deduction under 2(m) of the Wealth Tax Act - The assessee company borrowed loans from the directors for the purpose of discharging bank loans and releasing mortgage over the land - Held that:- On going through the provision of the definition clause o ......

    2013 (3) TMI 570 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

    M/s. Sova (P) Ltd., Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Wealth Tax Special Range II Coimbatore

    Rectification u/s 35 of wealth tax act - mistake apparent from the record - held that:- when on the admitted fact that the claim of loss and non-declaration of dividend itself was made long after the revised assessment order and it never formed part ......

    2013 (3) TMI 474 - ITAT COCHIN

    Ms. Anjana Mohan Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Wealth-Tax,

    Urban land U/s 2(e)(a) of the Wealth Tax Act - Notices u/s. 17 - Sale consideration as the value of their portion of land - Valuation – Held that:- The market value is nothing but a price that may be agreed by a willing seller and a willing purchase ......

    2013 (3) TMI 360 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

    Commissioner of Welath Tax And Another Versus Shri Devendra Verma

    Initial compensation, enhanced compensation and interest - whether the right to compensation is an asset includable in the Net Wealth? - matter relates to the assessment year 1985-86 - Held that:- As decided in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Mehtab ( ......

    2013 (2) TMI 514 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

    SRI GYAN CHAND JAIN Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, BIHAR(II), RANCHI

    Addition of Rs.23,59,461 made up to the AY 1971-72 as extra income of the appellant available for purposes of taxation under the Wealth Tax Act? - contention of the petitioner that the assessment of income of the petitioner was based on the assessmen ......

    2013 (2) TMI 248 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

    The Commissioner of Wealth-tax Tamilnadu Nadu-I, Madras. Versus M/s. Kumudam Printers Pvt. Ltd.

    Exemption from wealth tax - property used by Director, Manager and Secretary as residential accommodation – Allotted the premises at Door No.20 to the Managing Director for being used as residence – Held that:- A careful reading of the provisions in ......

    2013 (1) TMI 608 - SUPREME COURT

    Satya Nand Munjal Versus Commissioner of Gift Tax

    Gift tax on the value of the bonus shares - fundamental question before the High Court in [2002 (5) TMI 42 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] that whether there was in fact a gift of 14,000 bonus shares made by the assess to the transferee? - reopening ......

    2012 (11) TMI 45 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD

    Rajal Investment Co.Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Wealth Tax Officer Ward-5(3) Ahmedabad

    Right of user charges - Addition to wealth - property in question consisting of jewellery and silver vessels - Held that:- A.O. rightly denied the deduction towards Right of user of Rajal. Following the decision of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case ......

    2012 (10) TMI 375 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

    Commissioner of Income Tax Versus G. P. Gaur

    Date of valuation of shares - Whether the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the value of shares must be taken at the rate quoted the lowest in any of the stock exchange situated in the country though the assessee was assessed to tax elsewhere ......

    2012 (10) TMI 338 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

    Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Chennai Versus N. Thanu

    Income received in advance is an Asset or not – Assessee is running a tutorial institute. As regards the fee received from students, it is stated that the assessee charged the full fee for the entire course of study which ran to different years. Ques ......

    2012 (10) TMI 162 - ITAT PUNE

    Gangadhar D. Kshirsagar Versus DCWT, Central Circle 1(1), Pune

    Whether cash seized and was deposited in PD account with CIT, liable to includible in Wealth of assessee – Assessee argued that this amount was declared as income in subsequent year and the assessee had paid the tax, therefore, the same cannot be inc ......

   
 
1.... ..
 
 

 

what is new what is new

Subscription UpdatesNewslettersCommunicationOther Options




Go To Top

Go to Mobile Website

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.