Quick Search
Advanced Search:
|| New User / Register || Lost Password || Subscription || My Book Marks || Stay sign in
  Left Stop Start Right    Section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) - Reference to - Constitution of DRP at specified places - Cir. No. 1/FT&TR/....       Assessment - General - Processing of returns of assessment year 2011-12 - Steps to clear backlog - Cir. No. 01/2012 Dated: February 2, 2012....       Fixation of Standard Input-Output Norms (SION) for the export product “Articles made of Thermo Plastic Elastomer (TPE)”. - Cir. No. 95 /(RE-2010)/2009....       Fixation of Standard Input Output Norms (SION) of Food Products (Product Code: ‘E’) in the Handbook of Procedures V.2 (2009-14). - Cir. No. 92 (R....       Amendment of Standard Input Output Norms (SION) of Food Products (Product Code: ‘E’) in the Handbook of Procedures V.2 (2009-14). - Cir. No. 93 (R....       Amendment of Standard Input Output Norms (SION) of Food Products (Product Code: ‘E’) in the Handbook of Procedures V.2 (2009-14). - Cir. No. 94 (....       Deferred Payment Protocols dated April 30, 1981 and December 23, 1985 between Government of India and erstwhile USSR. - Cir. No. 74 Dated: February 1,....       Implementation of The Pneumatic Tyres and Tubes for Automotive Vehicles (Quality Control) Order 2009 – reg. - Cir. No. F.No. 528/109/2011-STO (TU) Da....       Classification of Fused Silica under Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - regarding. - Cir. No. 03 / 2012 - Customs Dated: February 1, 2012....       Amends Notification No. 36/2001-Customs(N.T) Palm oil, Palmolein, Soyabean Oil (Crude) and Brass Scrap (all grades) - Traiff Values. - Ntf. No. 10/20....       Opening of Diamond Dollar Accounts (DDAs). - Cir. No. 73 Dated: January 31, 2012....       Capital gain - period of limitation for deposit the amount in Capital Gain Account Scheme - Sub-Section (4) of Section 139 provides extended period of....       Fringe Benefit Tax – car dealer - Expenditure incurred on accessories which were supplied to customers who have purchased cars cannot be treated as sa....       Capital gains – In view of the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 50C, if fair market value as assessed by the DVO is lower than the value adopt....       Allowable u/s 37(1)- Whether the expenses incurred on construction of tennis court are allowable as revenue expenses or are capital in nature - the ex....       Authorized service station - authorised dealers of General Motors - also undertook the servicing of vehicles manufactured by the other manufacturers –....       Liability to pay Service tax by government authority undertaking Insurance business – Insurance business is not a sovereign act. - service tax would b....       Unexplained Investment – The assessee had valued the stock at cost price. The cost price as recorded in the books was not rejected or adversely commen....       Deduction u/s 43B in respect of interest paid on additional sales-tax - Tribunal rejected the claim on the ground that interest did not fall within th....       Notification 44/2002 - EPCG Scheme - The facts that the cars were not registered as a tourist vehicle and the Appellants did not bill for the use of c....      
Case Laws
 
Customs
Records 1 to 20 of 12996
 

TMI - 209643 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

M/s SREE RAJENDRA TEXTILES, BANGALORE Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

Whether continued detention of goods can be justified - petitioner imported Silk Fabric in November, 2010 – goods held under the custody of the Department since then - interim directions issued for provisional release of goods subject to furnishing o......

 

TMI - 209642 - CESTAT, Bangalore

M/s. SAP India Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of Customs Bangalore.

Refund - recovery of duty twice from the appellant and from the customers of the appellant - the appellants filed a refund claim for refund of Rs.5,21,98,021/- paid by them. The DRI has on a query stated that the impugned amount was deposited volunta......

 

TMI - 209641 - CESTAT, DELHI

M/s.Automotive Tyre Importers Association & Others DA/MOF

Imposition of anti-dumping duty on tyres, tubes and tyre-flaps - appellant states that his share of imports compared to total consumption is insignificant and cannot be a cause of injury to the domestic industry, many of the economic indicators taken......

 

TMI - 209623 - KERALA HIGH COURT

HARI PRIYA TRADERS Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

-......

 

TMI - 209622 - KERALA HIGH COURT

MOHAMMED FARIZ AND CO Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

-......

 

TMI - 209621 - KERALA HIGH COURT

HARI PRIYA TRADERS Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

-......

 

TMI - 209620 - KERALA HIGH COURT

M/S.GLOBAL INDUSTRIES Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

-......

 

TMI - 209579 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

D.K. ENTERPRISES Versus PIMPRI CHINCHWAD MUNICIPAL COUNCIL

Octroi payment - Who should bear the liabilty on the goods auctioned - If the Warehouse fails to give delivery of the goods or such goods are not exported with the specified period, Warehousing Corporation is liable to pay octroi at the prevailing ra......

 

TMI - 209577 - CESTAT, BANGALORE

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, HYDERABAD Versus HASTEN STORES

Penalty - prohibited goods - goods imported without IEC Number - confiscation under Section 111 sub-clause (d) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Held that:- importation without IEC ipso facto does not make the goods prohibited, respondent did not produce a ......

 

TMI - 209576 - CESTAT, BANGALORE

ACALMAR OILS & FATS LTD. Versus COMMR. OF CUSTOMS, VISAKHAPATNAM

Unjust enrichment - refund - appellant had filed bills of entries on 31-1-2006, which were provisionally assessed on the value of USD 415 PMT of the imported goods. On the very same day, vide Notification No. 7/2005-Cus., (N.T.) dated. 31-1-2006, the......

 

TMI - 209575 - CESTAT, BANGALORE

ABB LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE

Demand - Misdeclaration - Notification No. 13/2002-C.E. (N.T.), dated 1-3-2002 and amended by Notification No. 2/2006-C.E. (N.T.), dated 1-3-2006 - The impugned goods were basically electrical apparatus and were neither sold by weight or by measure -......

 

TMI - 209574 - CESTAT, CHENNAI

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CHENNAI Versus THERMO KING INDIA PVT. LTD.

Amendment of documents - Refund claim was rejected on the ground that the assessees have not challenged the assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) accepted the contention of the assessees that the case falls under ambit of Section 149 of the Customs ......

 

TMI - 209572 - CESTAT, BANGALORE

ITC LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, VISAKHAPATNAM

-......

 

TMI - 209571 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

ATLANTIC SHIPPING PVT. LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA

-......

 

TMI - 209568 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

IN RE : STAR WIRE (INDIA) LTD.

Revision application - drawback claim under Section 74 of Customs Act - Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Drawback) rejected claim - Government notes that the description of the goods as given in all the import tallies with the description given in ......

 

TMI - 209566 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

IN RE : SAINI DARSHAN SINGH KARTAR SINGH

Revision Application - seizure of foreign currency - applicant deposited the personal penalty and requested to release the foreign currency after deducting the redemption fine - release of foreign currency was denied treating the application as time ......

 

TMI - 209565 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

IN RE : NARAYAN INTERNATIONAL

-......

 

TMI - 209564 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

BOND STORES PVT. LTD. Versus CUS. & C. EX. SETTLEMENT COMMISSION

-......

 

TMI - 209559 - CESTAT, BANGALORE

VERIFONE INDIA PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE

Duty demand - Import - inadmissible exemption availed by the appellant - goods assessed to duty at the time of import in terms of Notification No. 13/81-Cus., dated 9-2-1981 and 123/81-C.E., dated 2-6-1981 on the strength of appropriate certificate o......

 

TMI - 209556 - CESTAT, MUMBAI

RUCHI ACRONI INDUSTRIES LTD. Versus COMMR. OF CUS. (IMPORT), MUMBAI

Refund claim - assessee cleared the goods on payment of VAT and filed a refund claim in terms of Notification No. 102/07-Cus, the refund claim was rejected on the ground that the appellants has not made endorsement on the invoices as per condition 2(......

   
 
1.... ..
 
 

 

Forum

what is new what is new

Site Search
News
Recent updates
Artciles
Communication

Currently 1073 users are online



Go To Top
© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.