New User / Register || Book Marks || Annual Subscription || Feed Back ||
Login: Stay
|| Forget Password ||
     
TMI - Tax Management India. Com  

Recent Discussionss:

Export goods from other manufacturer Service tax applicability on Directors remuneration Payment Made in Wrong Code TDS Payment done 94C instead of 94J Service tax on transport of coal to bio power plant court fee for filing appeal before Commssioner (Appeals) Re: Labour of supply works Service Tax on Services provided in J & K state interest rate on vat tax paid by late Revision/amendment in Shipping Bill

Central Excise Case Laws

 

Advanced Search options


Filter -


 
Showing 1 to 15 of 50392 Records

    2014 (4) TMI 510 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    CCE, Chennai -I Versus M/s. Futura Fibres

    CENVAT Credit - GTA Service - whether the respondent is eligible to avail CENVAT credit on service tax paid on outward transportation service during the period from April 2007 to January 2008 - Held that:- Commissioner (Appeals) following the decisio ......

    2014 (4) TMI 509 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    CCE, Chennai  III Versus M/s. Ultratech Cements Ltd.

    CENVAT CRedit - whether the respondents are eligible to avail CENVAT credit for the service tax paid on freight for outward transportation from the place of removal during the period March 2007 - Held that:- Calcutta High Court in the case of Vesuvio ......

    2014 (4) TMI 508 - SUPREME COURT

    COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ETC. ETC. Versus M/s ALBERT DAVID LTD ETC. ETC.

    CENVAT Credit - final product is exempted from payment of duty - The appellant availed exemption on clearance of waste and scrap under notification no.89/95-CE dated 18th of May, 1995 - SC dismissed the appeal against the decision of High Court [2013 ......

    2014 (4) TMI 506 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

    M/s. RM. Polypack (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise

    Waiver of pre deposit - Duty demand - Held that:- On merely establishing a prima facie case, interim order of protection should not be passed. But if on a cursory glance it appears that the demand raised has no leg to stand, it would be undesirable t ......

    2014 (4) TMI 504 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

    THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI IV COMMISSIONERATE, CHENNAI Versus M/s POS HYUNDAI STEEL MANUFACTURING (I) LTD AND CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI

    Intention to evade duty - CENVAT Credit - assessee was not aware of the same, therefore, reversed the credit on the basis of the transaction value of the inputs, paid the differential amount in October 2003 - Equivalent penalty u/s 11AC - Suppression ......

    2014 (4) TMI 503 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    Drytech Processors (I) Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE, Bhopal

    Waiver of pre deposit - Denial of benefit of exemption Notification No. 3/2007 - Held that:- precedent interim order should normally be followed but we also take note of the plea of the ld. Advocate that the amounts involved in the earlier stay order ......

    2014 (4) TMI 502 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    M/s JANSONS TEXTILE PROCESSORS Versus CCE, SALEM

    Whether the main applicant, a textile processor was eligible for the Compounded Levy Scheme (CLS) as notified under Notification No.16/2000-CE, dated 30.04.2000, which came into effect from 01.05.2000 - Held that:- there is a strong prima facie case ......

    2014 (4) TMI 501 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

    M/s JAI CORPORATION LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, VAPI

    Availment of CENVAT Credit - Credit taken in respect of the goods received from a 100% EOU - Held that:- appellant had been doing the calculation based upon the formula which has been mentioned in sub-rule (7) of Rule 3 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 f ......

    2014 (4) TMI 500 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    CCE, Bhopal Versus MP. United Polyproline Ltd.

    Valuation of goods - addition of 1% charges recovered by the respondents from their clients and shown separately in the bills as insurance charges - Held that:- Admittedly, prior to the 01.10.96, all the invoices reflecting upon collection of 1% insu ......

    2014 (4) TMI 499 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

    Shri SP. Malkoti and others Versus CCE Vadodara

    Penalty under the provision of Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Assessee abated in clearance of the Cigarettes under the guise of Cigar and correct duty was not discharged - Held that:- Partial stay granted. ......

    2014 (4) TMI 463 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

    Commissioner of Central Excise Versus M/s. Kurele Pan Products Pvt. Ltd.

    Demand to the duty - Shortage in stock - Clandestine removal of goods - opportunity of cross examination of the witnesses - Held that:- From the record, it reveals that the first date was fixed on 24.08.2009. On 17.09.2009 the respondent wrote a lett ......

    2014 (4) TMI 462 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

    Ram Pyare Yadav Versus Union of India And 3 Others

    Maintainability of appeal - Bar of limitation - Held that:- Order dated 21.1.2011 was dispatched to the petitioner by registered post. Be that as it may, in order to attract deeming provision regarding service under sub-section (2) of Section 37C of ......

    2014 (4) TMI 461 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

    M/s. Kamakhya Steels Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-I

    Duty demand - Non Alloy Steel - compounded levy scheme - Whether the appellant is liable for the duty for the Financial Year 1999-2000 on the actual production or on the deemed production under Rule 96 ZO (3) - Held that:- Tribunal has not considere ......

    2014 (4) TMI 460 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    M/s. Numeric Power System Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE, Pondicherry

    Rejection of the refund claim under Section 11B - Reversal of CENVAT Credit - Notification No. 108/95-CE dated 28.8.95 - Unjust enrichment - Held that:- appellant was directed to supply indigenously produced goods against advance licence. So the cont ......

    2014 (4) TMI 459 - CESTAT BANGALORE

    M/s. BEML Limited Versus CCE. Bangalore-I

    Waiver of pre deposit - recovery of CENVAT Credit wrongly taken - demand of interest - show-cause notice seems to have not been issued under appropriate Sections of Central Excise Act. - Held that:- prima facie case has been made out by the appellant ......

   
 
1.... ..
 
 

 

what is new what is new

UpdatesKnowledge SharingSubscription CommunicationNewslettersMore Options




Go to Mobile Website Go To Top
© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.