New User / Register | Bookmarks | Annual Subscription | Feedback |
Login: Stay
| Forget Password |
           
TMI - Tax Management India. Com  

Recent Discussionss:

Export Without Central Excise registration Excise Duty on Tooling developed by Supplier Excise duty liabilities on one FG use in other FG within the Factory SERIES OF INVOICES service tax credit on commission service received 1% interest penalty when cenvat credit reversed without utilising Treatment of Share Issue Expenses in realtion to increased Authroised Capital Service Tax & Vat Bot charged on Window 8.1 Professional purchased transportation of goods by railway SERVICE TAX ON SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSULTING EXPENSES

Central Excise Case Laws

 

Advanced Search options


Filter -


 
Showing 1096 to 1110 of 52083 Records

    2014 (3) TMI 517 - CESTAT BANGALORE

    Mangalore Refinery & Petrochemicals Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of Central Excise Mangalore

    CENVAT credit - Credit denied in respect of structural materials (plates, channels and angles) which were claimed to have been used for repairs and maintenance of capital goods - Lower authorities, contended in the construction of factory shed/buildi ......

    2014 (3) TMI 516 - CESTAT BANGALORE

    M/s. Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd. Versus CCE, Mangalore

    Penalty - Waiver of pre deposit - Stay in respect of CENVAT credit - Denial of CENVAT credit on ‘works contract services’, ‘catering services’, ‘event management services’ - Bar of limitation - Held that:- demand is within the normal period. In the o ......

    2014 (3) TMI 515 - CESTAT BANGALORE

    M/s. GE India Industrial Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE, Bangalore

    Waiver of pre deposit - Cenvat Credit of service tax paid on input services where invoices were addressed to Head office - Duty paying documents - Held that:- appellant seems to have prima facie case in respect of some of the input services which, by ......

    2014 (3) TMI 514 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    M/s. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise (Service Tax), Thiruchirapalli

    Dutiability of goods - Applicant is a manufacturer of cement and they have supplied some quantity of cement to SEZ - Revenue was of the view that since the final product is exempt from duty, duty should have paid on the clinker which is an intermedia ......

    2014 (3) TMI 489 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Versus CCE, Delhi-III

    Valuation (Central Excise) - Freight and service charges - Held that:- Dispute in the present appeal is for the period January 2004 to July 2011 i.e. the period after 1.7.2000 when the new Section 4 came into existence. We find that in the case of ap ......

    2014 (3) TMI 488 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    SHARP INDUSTRIES LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, THANE-II

    Default in payment of duty - restriction on utilizing cenvat credti under Rule 8(3A) - Violation of first proviso to sub-rule 4 of Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - Assessee showed that duty was paid in cash through Account Current even though no ......

    2014 (3) TMI 487 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE-II Versus DATTA SHETKARI SETI MAL PRAKRIYA SANSTHA MARYADIT

    Penalty under section 11AC read with Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Held that:- As per the decision of Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills [2009 (5) TMI 15 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA], the Apex Court has held that if the ingredients of Sect ......

    2014 (3) TMI 486 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    ARVIND KUMAR, D DHIMAN AND MINAZ GADHIA Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NASIK

    Waiver of pre-deposit - Penalties, under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Held that:- if duty, interest and 25% of duty as penalty has been paid within 30 days of the issuance of show-cause notice, the proceedings against all the co-notice ......

    2014 (3) TMI 485 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

    M/s VARDHMAN STAMPINGS PVT LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, AHMEDABAD-III

    Availment of CENVAT Credit - Cenvat credit on CRGO Coils, under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 along with charging of interest under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - Activity of slitting of these CRGO coils was done at their facto ......

    2014 (3) TMI 484 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    M/s. Archana Spinners Ltd. Versus CCE, Tirunelveli

    Prayer of adjustment of excess paid duty with short payment - Revenue contended that manufacturer has not complied with Rule 9B as provisional assessment and therefore he should have filed Refund claim u/s 11B - revenue denied the adustment - Held th ......

    2014 (3) TMI 483 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD (LB)

    RAJABALI ISMAIL RAJBARA Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, SURAT

    Recovery of arrears of excise duties - Attachment of property - There was a lease agreement between M/s. Bhavya Apparels Pvt. Ltd. and the appellant herein for leasing out the property - Lease agreement was an unregistered document as there is no sta ......

    2014 (3) TMI 482 - CESTAT BANGALORE

    M/s Ultratech Cement Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Guntur

    Waiver of pre deposit - Denial of CENVAT Credit - Input services in respect of Employees Health Insurance - period prior to 1.4.2008 - Held that:- in view of decision in Commissioner vs. Stanzen Toyotetsu India (P) Ltd. [2011 (4) TMI 201 - KARNATAKA ......

    2014 (3) TMI 481 - CESTAT BANGALORE

    M/s Micro Labs Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore

    Denial of CENVAT credits - Waiver of pre deposit - Excess credit over what were admissible to the appellant in terms of the formula prescribed under Rule 3(7) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Held that:- Following earlier preceedents in similar iss ......

    2014 (3) TMI 480 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    GODAWARI POWER & ISPAT LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., RAIPUR

    Denial of Cenvat credit of duty paid on the coal received on the ground that coal supplier should not have paid duty inasmuch as coal was unconditionally exempted vide Notification No. 63/95-C.E., dated 16-3-1995 which was withdrawn with effect from ......

    2014 (3) TMI 457 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s Modern Dairies Ltd. (Unit-II) Versus CCE & ST, Panchkula

    Waiver of pre-deposit - Stay of recovery of Cenvat Credit - Imposition of interest and equal penalty - Held that:- Cenvat Credit on inputs used in manufacture of exempted goods is deniable under Rule 6(1) Cenvat Credit Rule. In this case if Dairy Mac ......

   
 
 
 

 

what is new what is new

UpdatesKnowledge SharingSubscription CommunicationNewslettersMore Options




Quick Links: | Acts and Rules | Notifications | Circulars | Schedules | Tariff | Forms | Case Laws | Manuals |
| Home | About us | Contact us | Feed Back | Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Members | |
Go to Mobile Website Go To Top
© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.