New User / Register | Bookmarks | Annual Subscription | Feedback |
Login: Stay
| Forget Password |
           
TMI - Tax Management India. Com  

Recent Discussionss:

Reversal of Cenvat credit CENVAT CREDIT TO DEVELOPERS Procedure to sent back the rejected imported material Applicability of State VAT or CST valuation job work BUDGET CHANGES REGARDING DTA CLEARANCES Cenvat Credit CT -1 procedure current local tax rate (vat rate) for s.s patta/ coil / strip Rules of register

Central Excise Case Laws

 

Advanced Search options


Filter -


 
Showing 1096 to 1110 of 51496 Records

    2014 (2) TMI 824 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    KIRLOSKAR OIL ENGINES LTD Versus CCE

    Rejection of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty under protest - Held that:- It is a case where duty has been paid under protest by the appellant on persuasion of the department on intermediate product. It is also an admitted fact that although d ......

    2014 (2) TMI 823 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    Titan Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, LTU, Chennai

    Availment of CENVAT Credit - Input Service Distributor - Violation of Rule 7 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - Denial of excess input service credit - Held that:- other units of input service distributor are exclusively engaged in the manufacture of exe ......

    2014 (2) TMI 822 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s POOJA FORGE LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

    Interest demand - Reversal of CENVAT Credit under Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - CENVAT Credit taken on such inputs was not reversed at the time of removal of inputs as such, which resulted in short reversal of CENVAT Credit - Recovery ......

    2014 (2) TMI 821 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    KUNDAN INDUSTRIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

    Remission of duty upon destruction of final product - Whether the manufacturer is required to reverse the Cenvat Credit on the inputs used in manufacturing such final product - Held that:- destruction of goods due to natural cause of accident, the in ......

    2014 (2) TMI 820 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s. Whirlpool of India Ltd. Versus CCE & ST, Ltu Delhi

    Eligibility to CENVAT Credit - Whether the appellant would be eligible for Cenvat credit of service tax paid on the premium for Group Insurance Policy provided by the appellant to their workers - Interest under Rule 15 - Held that:- Cenvat credit in ......

    2014 (2) TMI 819 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Versus HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVERAGES PVT LTD

    Setting aside of penalty under Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules, 1994 for non confiscation of goods - demand of duty with interest and penalty was confirmed earlier - Held that:- nowhere in the show-cause notice nor in the adjudication order, propos ......

    2014 (2) TMI 818 - CESTAT KOLKATA

    M/s. BAAHUBALI FERRO TECH & POWER PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOLPUR

    Waiver of pre deposit - clandestine clearance of M.S. ingots - Imposition of equal penalty - Purchase the raw materials in the name of the Applicant No.(1) - Credit taken on purchases - Held that:- Applicant No.(1) has taken the Central Excise Regist ......

    2014 (2) TMI 817 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    M/s. Empee Sugars & Chemicals Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirunelveli

    Eligibility to CENVAT Credit - Assessee took Cenvat credit of duty paid on the capital goods used for setting up plant for generating electricity - about 87% of the electricity generated by the plant was sold to TNEB and only about 13% was used capti ......

    2014 (2) TMI 816 - CESTAT KOLKATA

    M/s SAIL Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Bolpur

    Waiver of predeposit of duty - Imposition of equal penalty u/s 11AC - Determination of assessable value of goods - Inclusion of freight value - Held that:- It is the claim of the Revenue that even though certain quantities of goods were sold on ex-wo ......

    2014 (2) TMI 777 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD Versus CCE

    Interest on delayed payment - Rule 20 of CER, 2002 - Warehousing provisions - Whether the appellants are required to pay interest on this delayed payment of duty or not - Held that:- there being no Circular issued by the Board, specifying any interes ......

    2014 (2) TMI 775 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

    Aarti Industries Limited (formerly known as M/s. Surfactant Specialties Limited) Versus Union of India and Others

    Rejection of rebate claim - original and duplicate copy of ARE1 for the goods exported not submitted - original and duplicate copy of ARE1 lost in transit - photo copies of the requisite original and duplicate ARE1 of the goods submitted - Held that: ......

    2014 (2) TMI 774 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

    DURALL SYSTEMS INDIA PVT LTD Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

    Waiver of pre-deposit - Extended period of limitation - Excisability of structures - manufacturing aluminum sliding windows & aluminum doors - SSI exemption - Items were directly comes to the site where the structure was erected and glass was fixed - ......

    2014 (2) TMI 772 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

    Sunland Metal Recycling Industries Versus Union of India

    Power to levy penalty for violation of CENVAT Credit Rules - Challenge to the validity of rule 13(2) of CCR 2002 and Rule 15(2) of CCR, 2004 as ultra-virus to Central Excise Act, 1994 - Delegated legislation - appellant were using non duty paid scrap ......

    2014 (2) TMI 771 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

    M/s JC. Rolling Mill Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise

    Maintainability of appeal - Non appearance of parties - Notice not served - Notice returned as not known - Tribunal dismissed appeal assuming that they are not interested in pursuing this appeal - Held that:- notice which was remitted to the assessee ......

    2014 (2) TMI 770 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

    Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida Versus M/s. Accurate Chemical Industries

    Invocation of extended period of limitation - Section 11A (1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Held that:- if a scrutiny had been made by the Range Officer of the ER-1 returns, that would have revealed that the assessee had cleared its MS tanks and ......

   
 
 
 

 

what is new what is new

UpdatesKnowledge SharingSubscription CommunicationNewslettersMore Options




Quick Links: | Acts and Rules | Notifications | Circulars | Schedules | Tariff | Forms | Case Laws | Manuals |
| Home | About us | Contact us | Feed Back | Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Members | |
Go to Mobile Website Go To Top
© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.