New User / Register | Bookmarks | Annual Subscription | Feedback |
Login: Stay
| Forget Password |
           
TMI - Tax Management India. Com  

Recent Discussionss:

Service Tax on Commission ACCOUNTING TREATMENT FOR DIFFERENCE IN FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES ACCOUNTING FOR DIFFERENCE IN FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES PAYMENT OF SERVICE TAX ON MEETING FEE Description and format of various RG Registers cenvat credit taken after 8 month of invoice issue date Central excise query - rate diffrence in excise invoice Drawback on the material on which Cenvat Credit has been taken Reversal of equilent Cenvat Credit on removal of inputs can eligible to take input credit even not registered under central excise registration

Income Tax Case Laws - Section: 69A

 

Income Tax


Cases for Section: 69A
 
Showing 16 to 30 of 391 Records
 

2014 (3) TMI 651 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Subodhchandra & Co. Versus Income Tax Officer

Suppressed sale – Excess consumption of gold in manufacture - Whether the Tribunal were right in raising inference on fact and in law that the alleged excess consumption of gold in manufacture of gold ornaments through various artisans, were suppress ......

2014 (3) TMI 645 - ITAT MUMBAI

Tejas Dharamdas Sodha Versus Income Tax Officer – 14(2) (1)

Addition towards profit on undisclosed turnover – Held that:- The turnover is reflected in the bank account in the name of the assessee’s proprietary concern, with the assessee itself stating it to be on account of his business, representing receipts ......

2014 (2) TMI 898 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Me And Mummy Hospital Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Reference made to Valuation Officer u/s 142A(1) of the Act -Valuation of investment in the construction/renovation of the property - Whether the requirements of exercising such powers u/s 142A calling for DVO’s report are satisfied – Held that:- The ......

2014 (2) TMI 514 - ITAT COCHIN

Shri A. Abdul Salam M/s AS. Cashew Exporters Versus Dy. CIT, Cent. Cir. Kollam

Addition made u/s 43B of the Act - Assessee has not furnished any explanation to the proposal - Held that:- The assessing officer found that the sales were shown as net of trade discount - the assessee debited an amount in the profit & loss account a ......

2014 (2) TMI 433 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

M/s. JK. Bankers Versus CIT.

Disallowance of Interest u/s 40(b) of the Act – Interest paid to Partners – Deletion made as unexplained cash credits – Survey u/s 133A of the Act – Held that:- The assessee has explained the source of the money in its hands and has, therefore, also ......

2014 (2) TMI 261 - ITAT AGRA

Smt. Vimla Rani Agarwal Versus Income-tax Officer

Addition made u/s 69A of the Act – unexplained money – Held that:- Several transactions through banking channel were carried out in their bank accounts in several lacs to prove that they were regularly getting the amounts on clearance and were withdr ......

2014 (1) TMI 1403 - ITAT MUMBAI

Mrs. Chanda B. Mali Versus Income Tax Officer, Mumbai

Applicability of section 69A - Held that:- The assessee filed before the AO the declaration of gifts, the bank statements of donors and also their source for giving the gifts - The initial onus is discharged by the assessee by proving the identity of ......

2014 (1) TMI 1396 - ITAT DELHI

ACIT, Circle 19 (1), New Delhi Versus Shri Ram Kishan Bhageria,. Prop. M/s. Raj Laxmi Knitting Co.

Addition on account of low G.P. rate - Held that:- The gross profit rate for the year under consideration comes to around 11.82% after reducing the value of excess stock found during search – The last year gross profit rate was 12.5% - The AO has mad ......

2014 (1) TMI 491 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Dr. Raghuvendra Singh Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Ludhiana

Undisclosed investment - Held that:- As per section 142A(1) inserted by Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 with retrospective effect from 15.11.1972 - Assessing Officer wherever considers fit to estimate the value of any investment referred to in Section 69 or ......

2014 (1) TMI 185 - ITAT HYDERABAD

Shiv Shankar Taparia Versus DCIT, Circle 2 (2), Hyderabad

Unexplained deposits u/s 69A - Held that:- when the assessee claims that he has withdrawn the amount on earlier occasion and the same was kept with him for some time and later it was deposited into the bank account, it is the duty of the assessee to ......

2014 (1) TMI 132 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Smt. Asharfi Devi Shiksha Samiti Versus The Commissioner Income Tax And Another

Unexplained cash credit in form of corpus donation - Held that:- The AO carried out enquiries to satisfy himself about the identities and creditworthiness of the donors and the genuineness of the transactions - The letters were sent to a number of do ......

2014 (1) TMI 130 - ITAT RAJKOT

M/s. MP. Scrap Traders, Shri Kishorebhai Mohanlal Versus The Asstt. CIT, Circle-5, Rajkot

Unexplained investment - unexplained excess cash - Held that:- The assessee has disclosed and accepted his income during the survey operation through return of income filed - He has also filed an affidavit in respect of retraction - After the assesse ......

2013 (12) TMI 723 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Commissioner of Income Tax And Another Versus Smt. Sadhana Jain, Meerut

Undisclosed investment - purchase of shares on credit from different 207 persons - Held that:- The details and other evidences in the nature of cheques, their dates, amounts, particulars of banks and addresses of the persons who are stated to have s ......

2013 (12) TMI 362 - ITAT PUNE

Nandan Associates Versus Income Tax Officer, Pune

Addition of income u/s 69A – During the course of survey u/s 133A - The assessee, had received Rs.2.39 crores in cash from Marvel group – The assessee has also received Rs. 1.61 crores through cheque as an advance for agreement to sale - Held that:- ......

2013 (11) TMI 1442 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Commissioner of Income-tax, Agra Versus Devendra Kumar Gupta

Income of minor - additions u/s 69 - Held that:- The children filed returns under Amnesty Scheme, which had been accepted by the Assessing Officer, treating their separate income as such this amount was not liable to be added in the income of the ass ......

 
   
 
 
 

 

what is new what is new

Updates Knowledge Sharing Subscription Communication Newsletters More Options




Quick Links: | Acts and Rules | Notifications | Circulars | Schedules | Tariff | Forms | Case Laws | Manuals |
| Home | About us | Contact us | Feed Back | Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Members | |
Go to Mobile Website Go To Top
© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.