2014 (8) TMI 235 - ITAT CHANDIGARH
THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus HARYANA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Cancellation of order u/s 250(6) and u/s 154 Held that:- CIT (A) had observed that the appeal arises from the order of the D.C.I.T., Panchkula u/s 154 of the Act, meaning thereby that the appeal was filed before the CIT (A) against the order passed ......
2014 (8) TMI 109 - ITAT MUMBAI
Suresh Prasad Chokhani HUF Versus ITO. - Ward 14(2) (1), Mumbai
Ex-parte order passed - Principles of natural justice Opportunity of being heard Held that:- CIT(A) is required to allow proper and sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee - order passed by the CIT(A) is not in accordance with the r ......
2014 (6) TMI 637 - ITAT MUMBAI
SV. Steel Industries Versus Income Tax Officer
Procedure in appeal u/s 250(6) of the Act Exparte order - Held that:- The purpose of enquiry into the reasons for the assessees non-attendance before the CIT(A), even as clarified during the hearing itself, was to ascertain if there has been any a ......
2014 (6) TMI 142 - ITAT MUMBAI
M/s. The Presidency Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. C/o. Jai Hindi Society Recreation Club Versus ACIT 21(1), Mumbai
Addition of Transfer Fees and TDR premium power of appellate commission to accept fresh claim being revised computation - Held that:- Even if a claim is not made before the AO it can be made before the appellate authorities - The jurisdiction of th ......
2014 (5) TMI 82 - ITAT MUMBAI
FRANKLIN A DAVID Versus JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Partial confirmation of addition u/s 250 of the Act Confirmation of estimated gross profit Held that:- There was no reason to uphold the additions on account of direct costs once the books of account has been rejected and the gross profit rate ha ......
2013 (12) TMI 477 - ITAT COCHIN
The Income Tax Officer Versus M/s. Device Driven (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Deduction u/s 10A - Held that:- The assessing officer could not entertain the claim made by the assessee otherwise than through a revised return, nothing prevented the learned Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals) from considering the claim of the asse ......
2013 (9) TMI 483 - ITAT DELHI
M/s Universal Industries Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(2), New Delhi
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Unexplained cash credit - Non speaking order - Held that:- ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A) has not passed a speaking order on various issues raised in the appeal before him, we consider it fair and appropriate to set aside ......
2013 (8) TMI 698 - ITAT CHANDIGARH
Shri Rishi Sagar Versus The Income Tax Officer-III
Admission of additional evidence u/s 46A - CIT rejected additional evidence - Held that:- The reliance placed by the the assessee on the ratio laid down by the Honble Punjab & Haryana High Court in CIT V Mukta Metal Works (2011 (2) TMI 250 - PUNJA ......
2013 (7) TMI 692 - ITAT DELHI
Vipul Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCIT Circle-17(1) New Delhi
Validity of order - Whether the CIT (A) is justified in making arbitrary disallowance on the ground of non availability of the reasons variation in the GP Ratio which had been filed alongwith the GP/ NP comparative chart Held that:- order passed by ......
2013 (7) TMI 220 - ITAT INDORE
Shri Arun Sehlot, Sandhya Sehlot and others Versus ACIT, 3(1), Bhopal
Assessment in case of search or requisition - AO treated the income shown under the head "Income from agriculture income as income from other sources" - CIT(A) did not admit the assessee additional evidence in the form of original lease agreements, o ......
2013 (6) TMI 460 - ITAT MUMBAI
Cinetek Telefilms P. Ltd. Versus ACIT 11(1) Mumbai
Disallowance was made u/s 40(a)(ia) - short deduction of TDS - 194C v/s 194I - Held that:- This issue is no more res integra in view of several orders passed by various benches of the Tribunal holding that short-deduction of tax at source cannot lead ......
2013 (5) TMI 721 - ITAT AHMEDABAD
Income Tax Officer Versus Shri Omprakash Ramniwas Soni, Prop of South Assam Road Carrier
Disallowance of unexplained cash credit - CIT (A) deleted the addition restricting the addition to business income @ 11% GP - Held that:- AO had made addition on the basis that the assessee had deposited cash in his bank account & has not detected an ......
2013 (5) TMI 533 - ITAT MUMBAI
Shri Dilip C. Bagri Versus Income Tax Officer-4(1) (1)
Condonation of delay in filing the appeal - CIT(A) dismissed the same as barred by limitation - Held that:- On appreciating the facts it is noticed that the assessee actually filed an application u/s 154 in the month of May, 2009 and the issues are c ......
2013 (4) TMI 484 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Sanjay Kumar Sahu Versus Income Tax Officer & another
Section 250 - Stay of recovery - Coercive measures - Attached the bank account - Held that:- As per Section 250 (6A) specifically provides that during the pendency of this petition, the Assessee should not be treated as defaulter and apparently the a ......
2013 (2) TMI 263 - ITAT HYDERABAD
M/s SEVEN HILLS BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LTD. DEPUTY Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. CIRCLE-3(1). HYDERABAD
Non deduction of TDS u/s 194J - disallowance u/s 40a(ia) - Held that:- As decided in Merilyn Shipping & Transports Visakhapatnam V/s. ACIT Range-I, Visakhapatnam [2012 (4) TMI 290 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM] the provisions of S.40a(ia) are applicable only ......