New User / Register | Bookmarks | Annual Subscription | Feedback |
Login: Stay
| Forget Password |
           
TMI - Tax Management India. Com  

Recent Discussionss:

Export Without Central Excise registration Excise Duty on Tooling developed by Supplier Excise duty liabilities on one FG use in other FG within the Factory SERIES OF INVOICES service tax credit on commission service received 1% interest penalty when cenvat credit reversed without utilising Treatment of Share Issue Expenses in realtion to increased Authroised Capital Service Tax & Vat Bot charged on Window 8.1 Professional purchased transportation of goods by railway SERVICE TAX ON SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSULTING EXPENSES

Income Tax Case Laws - Section: 269SS

 

Income Tax


Cases for Section: 269SS
 
Showing 1 to 15 of 175 Records
 

2014 (8) TMI 872 - ITAT MUMBAI

LODHA BUILDERS PVT LTD And OTHERS Versus ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Levy of penalty u/s 271D/E Violation of provisions of section 269SS - Adjustments through journal entries - Business of land development and construction of real estate properties - Limitation of time Time barred penalty order us/ 271(1)(c) - Hel ......

2014 (8) TMI 603 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

The Commissioner of Income tax Versus M/s. Rashi Injection Moulders

Penalty u/s 271D Cash loans received from creditors Reasonable cause for taking loans explained by assessee or not - Held that:- The sundry loans have been extended by the agriculturists within the limits prescribed u/s 269SS of the Income Tax Ac ......

2014 (8) TMI 40 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

Director of Income Tax Exemptions, Chennai Versus M/s. Young Men Christian Association

Penalty u/s 271D and 271E Cash loan transactions treated as undisclosed income u/s 68 waiver of penalty u/s 273B - Held that:- The Tribunal have considered the order of the Assessing Authority that it is a case of unexplained cash receipt and tre ......

2014 (7) TMI 915 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Sarbhan Co-Op Agri. Produce Pro. And Marketing Soc. Ltd. Versus Union of India And 1

Penalty u/s 271D/ 271E Amount accepted or repaid in contravention of section 269SS and 269T Held that:- Ample opportunity will be given to the assessee to submit its case - whether with respect to the transactions provisions of Sections 269-SS an ......

2014 (7) TMI 808 - ITAT HYDERABAD

ITO, Ward 11(2), Hyderabad Versus M/s. Laxmi Srinivasa Finance Corporation

Penalty u/s 271D cash transaction with OSFC a unit of assessee - Cash deposits received more than ₹ 10,000 Violation of provisions of section 269SS - Held that:- OSFC is not different from the assessee firm and the AO assessed the income/l ......

2014 (7) TMI 522 - ITAT COCHIN

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM Versus SHRI LISTIN STEPHEN

Acceptance of loan in Cash - violation of section 269SS - Penalty u/s 271D of the Act Purpose of loan Business or not - The claim of the assessee is that he has accepted loans from various persons by way of cash and returned the same to the perso ......

2014 (7) TMI 137 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX AHMEDABAD IV Versus MAA KHODIYAR CONSTRUCTION

Penalty u/s 271D of the Act Exception to section 269SS of the Act Cash accepted exceeding the limit Genuineness of loan/ deposit transaction Held that:- A sum of ₹ 42.75 lakhs has been taken by way of loan by the respondent from ten dif ......

2014 (6) TMI 47 - DELHI HIGH COURT

Commissioner of Income Tax-VI Versus Worldwide Township Projects Ltd.

Validity of order of Penalty u/s 271D of the Act Bar of limitation as provided in Section 275(1)(c) of the Act Violation of section 269SS of the Act - Held that:- The ambit of the Section 269SS is clearly restricted to transaction involving accep ......

2014 (5) TMI 665 - ITAT DELHI

M/s. Toscana Lasts Limited Versus ITO, Ward 16 (3), New Delhi

Levy of penalty u/s 271D of the Act Cash loan taken for purchase of property - Held that:- Assessee relied upon MOU dated 2.7.2008 - the assessee alongwith Mr. R.M. Zafarullah had jointly invested money to purchase property and thereafter share pro ......

2014 (5) TMI 436 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

M/s. Charan Dass Ashok Kumar, Moga (AADFC3410D) Versus Commissioner of Income Tax III, Ludhiana

Penalty u/s 271D - Acceptance of loan in Cash by the appellant firm from its agriculturist customer - violation of provisions of section 269SS - Refusal to take cognizance of extract of cash book Documentary evidence furnished or not Held that:- ......

2014 (5) TMI 388 - ITAT HYDERABAD

The Deputy CIT Central Circle-6, Hyderabad Versus Smt. C. Swapna, Hyderabad

Scope of section 269SS of the Act Journal entries Penalty proceedings u/s 271D of the Act Held that:- Following Smt. C. Swapna, Hyderabad [2014 (4) TMI 71 - ITAT HYDERABAD] - The assessee challenged the penalty proceedings initiated u/s 271D of ......

2014 (5) TMI 271 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

Income-tax Officer Versus Smt. Sapna Sandip Shah Gajra Nivas, Jain Society

Deletion of Penalty u/s 271D of the Act Cash loans noticed during assessment Violation of section 269SS of the Act - Held that:- Relying upon CIT us. Noida Toll Bridge Co. ltd. [ 2003 (1) TMI 46 - DELHI High Court] the amounts standing as liabili ......

2014 (4) TMI 67 - ITAT PUNE

New Phaltan Sugar Works Ltd. Versus Addl. CIT, Satara Range, Satara

Penalty u/s 271D Violation of Provisions levy of penalty where loans/deposits are genuine - Waiver of penalty u/s 273B - reasonable cause - Held that:- no phrase occurring in section 269SS to indicate that provisions will not apply to genuine tra ......

2014 (3) TMI 218 - KERALA HIGH COURT

M/s. Soundarya Textiles Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Contravention of section 269SS of the Act Penalty u/s 271DD of the Act Proper explanation not made - Held that:- There was no material to substantiate the questions raised by the appellant - The main allegation raised by the assessing officer for ......

2014 (2) TMI 1063 - ITAT DELHI

M/s NEERAJ SHOES INDUSTRIES PVT LTD Versus ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Penalty u/s 271D of the Act - Violation of section 269SS of the Act Mode of taking certain loans or deposits Held that:- Without giving any reason as to why he is not following the judgement in the case of Idhayam Publications Ltd.[2006 (1) TMI ......

 
   
 
 
1.... ..
 

 

what is new what is new

UpdatesKnowledge SharingSubscription CommunicationNewslettersMore Options




Quick Links: | Acts and Rules | Notifications | Circulars | Schedules | Tariff | Forms | Case Laws | Manuals |
| Home | About us | Contact us | Feed Back | Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Members | |
Go to Mobile Website Go To Top
© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.