2014 (2) TMI 1075 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Sagar Dutta Versus Commissioner of Income-tax And Another
Penalty u/s 271B of the Act – Audit of accounts as per section 44AB of the Act – Mandatory requirement to obtain approval - Held that:- The order imposing penalty does not disclose that prior approval of the Joint Commissioner was obtained in either ......
2014 (1) TMI 1582 - ITAT MUMBAI
Anahaita Nalin Shah Versus DCIT 4(1), Mumbai
Penalty u/s 271B - Tax Audit - The assessee failed to furnish bonafide reasons for not getting the books of accounts audited either before the AO or the FAA - Held that:- The assessees total turnover of the business in transacting shares was higher ......
2013 (12) TMI 1108 - ITAT PUNE
RR BUILDERS PVT LTD Versus ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Penalty u/s.271B – failure to get its accounts audited and furnished before prescribed date u/s 44AB - Waiver of penalty u/s 273B - Held that:- The audit report signed by the auditors in the instant case is dated 01-08-2008 - The assessee is required ......
2013 (12) TMI 1005 - ITAT KOLKATA
USHA A NARAYANAN Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Penalty under section 271B – failure to get its accounts audited - Held that:- the professional income of the assessee received from partnership firm of Chartered Accountants is taxable under the head “income from business or profession” - the asses ......
2013 (12) TMI 767 - ITAT PUNE
Krishi Utpanna Bazar Samittee Versus ITO, Ward-2(2), Jalgaon
Penalty u/s 271B - assessee has failed to audit its books of account as required u/s.44AB - Held that:- The assessee was exempt from tax upto A.Y. 2002-03 and the law was amended w.e.f. 01-04-2003 - As per the amended provision the definition of loc ......
2013 (10) TMI 658 - KERALA HIGH COURT
M/s. Metro Agencies Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Penalty u/s 271B - Failure to get its accounts audited or submitted before due date - Whether the cause shown by an assessee would constitute a good cause for the non-compliance in order to avoid him from paying the penalty imposed – contention that ......
2013 (10) TMI 649 - ITAT AMRITSAR
Improvement Trust Versus The Dy. CIT, Circle-I, Bathinda
Penalty u/s 271B of the Income Tax Act – Failure to comply with the requirement of tax audit u/s 44AB of the Income Tax Act - Explanation of the assessee to the show cause notice is that the assessee was a statutory body and it was also allowed regis ......
2013 (6) TMI 357 - ITAT CHANDIGARH
Himalyan Labour & Construction Coop Society Ltd. Versus DCIT. Mandi (HP)
Penalty u/s 271B - delay in filing return - non furnishing of tax audit report before the specified date - Held that:- Interpretation given by CIT(A) is correct because if return is filed late then requirement for non filing the audit report cannot b ......
2013 (4) TMI 392 - ITAT COCHIN
KV. Ramachandran Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 1(1)
Penalty u/s 271B - non maintenance of books off account by the taxpayer as a civil contractor mainly engaged in government contract - Also penalty u/s 271A levied - Held that:- When the Parliament in its wisdom expects every person carrying on busine ......
2013 (2) TMI 211 - Madras High Court
Commissioner of Income Tax I, Trichirapalli Versus Smt. M. Yesodha
Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS - ITAT deleted the penalty as assessee had taken the loan only from her father-in-law and the transaction was genuine - Held that:- In the light of the relationship between the assessee and her father-i ......
2013 (1) TMI 234 - ITAT PUNE
Banwari Sitaram Pasari HUF Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-3(1)
Penalty u/s 271B - Tax Audit u/s 44AB - Turnover - Speculative transaction - failure to get the accounts audited by a Chartered Accountant as per 44AB - assessee is an HUF which is engaged in online trading in commodities - Held that:- As the transac ......
2013 (1) TMI 107 - ITAT LUCKNOW
Cane Development Union Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Gonda
Penalty u/s. 271B - Failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB - assessee contented that its entire income being tax exempt u/s.80P accordingly there being no loss to the Revenue - A.Y. 2006-07 - Held that:- No reason to doubt the assessee when it stat ......
2012 (10) TMI 852 - ITAT, DELHI
M/s. Hridey Vikram, Versus Assistan Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 22(1), New Delhi.
Penalty u/s 271B - assessee had not got its account audited u/s 44AB - Held that:- As decided in ACIT Versus Smt. Bharti Sharma [2010 (7) TMI 494 - ITAT, NEW DELHI] the assessee cannot be penalized for the act for which there is no failure on his/her ......
2012 (10) TMI 807 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
The Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another Versus District Co-Operative Bank
Penalty u/s 271-B - failure to get accounts audited - violation of the provisions of Section 44-AB & its 2nd proviso - ITAT deleted the levy - Held that:- Apart from the fact that the audit of the respondent-society under Section 64 of the U.P. Coope ......
2012 (10) TMI 569 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Commissioner of Income-tax, Hisar Versus Market Committee, Sirsa
Penalty u/s 271B – Audit u/s 44AB - Whether Sec. 44AB is applicable where the assessee has no income from business or profession - Assessee is a Market Committee failed to get audit of books of account u/s 44AB - AO levied penalty u/s 271B – Held tha ......