2014 (1) TMI 1295 - ITAT COCHIN
Branch Manager Punjab National Bank Versus ITO (Intelligence)
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(c) of the Act – Stay application – Held that:- The penalty u/s 272A has to be levied by an officer not lower than a Joint Director or Joint Commissioner of Income-tax - A consequential amendment ought to have been made by the legi ......
2014 (1) TMI 387 - ITAT CUTTACK
Under Secretary & DDO, Panchayati Raj (Gram Panchayat) Versus Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax (TDS)
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) of the Act – No deliberate and contumacious default - Assessee contended that TDS submitted in due time – Held that:- Relying upon Section 272-A (2)(k) provides that penalty @ Rs. 100 per day may be levied if the person respons ......
2013 (12) TMI 305 - ITAT CUTTACK
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER Versus ADDL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) BHUBANESWAR
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) – Income-tax is deducted from the contractors’/ suppliers’ bills and credited to the respective head of Central Government through book adjustment - E-TDS was filed through a franchise holder for filing of e-TDS on behalf of Go ......
2013 (11) TMI 205 - ITAT CUTTACK
THE BRANCH MANAGER (TDS) Versus ADDL. CIT (TDS) BHUBANESWAR
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) – The exparte order passed by the learned CIT(A) vide order was under the challenge as to the imposition of the Penalty - Held that:- The penalty levied u/s.272A(2)(k) was cancelled for the respective assesses for the respectiv ......
2013 (5) TMI 305 - ITAT HYDERABAD
M/s. G. Pullareddy Charitable Trust Versus The DDIT (Exemptions) -II Hyderabad
Exemption u/s. 10(23C)(vi) - denial of claim - Reopening of assessment - also for filing the returns belatedly for these assessment years there was levy of penalty u/s. 272A(2)(e) - Held that:- There cannot be one authority for levying of penalty on ......
2012 (11) TMI 459 - ITAT AGRA
The Manager, Union Bank of India Versus Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Range -3, Mathura
Penalty for failure to submit returns or statements in time - reasonable cause - No notice issued for default under section 272A (2) (k) - Held that:- There is mistake in notice as regards mentioning of clause (2) of section 272A of the Act is cover ......
2012 (10) TMI 251 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA, HIGH COURT
Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Chandigarh Versus The Collector, Land Acquisition, Department of Industrial & Commerce
Non issuance of form 16A to the deductee within time as required u/s 203(1) - non ascertaining the PAN Number from the payees - penalty levied under Section 272A(2)(g)- Held that:- The explanation of the assessee for non-issuing the certificates with ......
2012 (5) TMI 50 - ITAT CHANDIGARH
Collector Land Acquisition Versus Additional Commissioner of Income-tax (TDS), Range
Penalty levied u/s 272A(2)(k) – delayed filing of e-TDS returns - Held that :- There was only a technical and venial breach to the provisions contained in Rules 31A (2) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 r.w.s. 200(3) requiring the assessee to submit quar ......
2012 (4) TMI 152 - ITAT BANGALORE
HTSL Community Service Trust Versus Joint Director of Income-tax (Exemptions), Range-17, Bangalore
Delay in filing return - Public Charitable trust U/S 12A - also secured recognition under section 80G(5)(vi) - levy of penalty under section 272A(2)(e) for not filing the return of income within the due date as prescribed in section 139 - assessee in ......
2012 (3) TMI 320 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Commissioner of Income-tax Versus Krishna Cold Storage
Penalty u/s 272A - The assessee, who is deriving income from its business of cold storage, was required to deduct tax at source from interest payable/paid to certain creditors and in case the creditors were not liable to pay any income tax, the asses ......
2011 (5) TMI 831 - ITAT LUCKNOW
Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank Versus Additional Commissioner of Income-tax
Penalty u/s 272A - failure to file quarterly TDS returns within prescribed time - Held that:- There is no dispute that the quarterly statements were filed late by certain days, and that the tax was deducted and was paid to the credit of Government in ......
2011 (3) TMI 1030 - ITAT, Mumbai
ITO Versus Moraj Building Concepts (P) Ltd.
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(c) - Tax deducted at source - Delay ranges from 733 days to 1031 days while furnishing the return - The quarterly TDS returns ultimately were filed by the assessee voluntarily without being prompted by any notice from the departme ......
2011 (3) TMI 880 - ITAT, Mumbai
Porwal Creative Vision (P) Ltd. Versus ACIT
Penalty u/s. 272A(2)(c) and (k) - The assessee was incurring losses and there was financial crisis and therefore due to non-availability of funds there were delays in making the payments and filing the returns - The Learned AR for the assessee has ri ......
2011 (2) TMI 51 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kanpur Versus Adhishashi Abhiyanta (Nirman Khand), Lok N. Vibhag (Mahoba)
Penalty under Section 272A(2)(c) of the Income Tax Act - tax deduction at source (the TDS) was deducted and deposited within time however, the return was not submitted within time under Section 206 of the Act - no merit in the appeal hence, dismissed ......
2010 (11) TMI 228 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Manager, Union Bank of India Ludhiana Versus Commissioner of Income Tax Ludhiana
Penalty u/s 272A (2)(f) - Delay in furnishing the certificate in Form 15H - As per the judgment of this Court in The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. State Bank of Patiala, [2004 -TMI - 10582 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court ] wherein it had been held t ......