|| New User || My profile || My Book Marks || SMS Services || Annual Subscription || Lost Password ||
Stay
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Refund claim denied - period of limitation - cause of action arose only on 15/11/06, when they paid for the second time as a result of audit objection - refund claim is withing period - Tri Rejection of Refund claim – appellant filed under protest letter on 7.1.1987. - after two days they filed six nos. classification lists - thus, the under protest letter has no effect in the eye of law - Tri An educational qualification recognized by law will not cease to be recognized by law merely because for practicing in the field to which the qualification relates, a further examination held by a body regulating that field of practice is to be taken. - HC Fulfillment of export obligation – it is not open to the customs authorities to presume that extension of the LOP would be granted by the Development Commissioner to facilitate evasion of duty. - HC Merely because the CIT is having a different view, the same would not entitle him to initiate revision proceedings u/s 263, if the view taken by the assessing officer is one of the possible views. - Tri Repayment of capital balance in cash would not attract the provisions of sec. 269T since it does not constitute loan or deposit. - Tri Penalty u/s 271E - violation of sec. 269T - the interest amount and the principal amount were paid in two different occasions - each amoount less then Rs. 20,000 - No penalty - Tri Disallowance under section 14A required finding of incurring of expenditure and where it was found that for earning exempted income no expenditure had been incurred, disallowance under section 14A could not stand. - Tri Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - non deduction of TDS - If the element of income cannot be established, provisions of section 40(a)(ia) cannot be invoked - Tri Gift of immovable property - assessee's brothers and mother have gifted their 1/8th undivided share - very heavy burden lies on the department to prove that it is not the real one - Tri Addition on account of negative stock - The quantitative details as submitted duly explained that there was no negative stock in any of the month. - Tri Rate of tax on the sale of Copper Wire Bars and Copper Cathods - whether would be charged and retained @ 4% or 1% - chargeable at 1%. - HC Appeal u/s 483 – modification sought by the appellant is against the fabric of the Scheme and in the domain of modifications of the Scheme and not of modification for working of the Scheme. - non-compliance of Section 2(19AA), would not render the Scheme unworkable. - HC Since the Director of the appellant-company was actively involved in the day to day activity of the appellant-company penalty on him under Rule 26 has been correctly imposed. - Tri In absence of direct or indirect involvement of the Managing Director in the clandestine removal of the goods no personal penalty under Rule 26 is imposable on him. - Tri Cenvat Credit denied - galvanization does not amount to the manufacture - The duty paid on the G.P. Coils etc., is more than Cenvat Credit taken and needs to be adjusted against the demand of the Cenvat Credit. - Tri Extended period of limitation - in cases of intention to evade duty relevant date for computation of extended period for show cause is the date of knowledge - Tri Rejection of transaction value and enhancement of assessable value has to be on the basis of some evidences on record. - NIDB data cannot be made the basis for enhancement of value - Tri    Left Stop Right
Income Tax - Case Laws
 

Income Tax


Cases for Section: 276B
 
Showing 1 to 15 of 72 Records
 

2012 (9) TMI 158 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Serco BPO (P.) Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, TDS Circle, Gurgaon

Non issuance of Tax Deduction Certificate (TDC) u/s 197 - assessee is subsidiary of Serco BPO Holdings Private Limited - Held that:- The power vested in the Assessing Officer for non issuance of TDC is to be exercised in a judicious manner & is requi ......

2011 (7) TMI 332 - Delhi High Court

Anil Batra Versus Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

Compounding of offence - revised guidelines - Prohibition - Held that:- the condition that offences could be compounded only before the filing of the complaint remained unaltered in the revised guidelines of 29.07.2003. - The amendment specifically s ......

2010 (11) TMI 17 - DELHI HIGH COURT

ITO Versus Delhi Iron Works (P) Ltd.

Failure to deduct TDS - principal officer - scope and liability of principal officer - punishment u/s 276B - person responsible for paying u/s 204 - Held that: - the director is not included within the ambit of Sub-clause (a) of Section 2(35) of the ......

2008 (9) TMI 5 - HIGH COURT DELHI

K.C. PALANISWAMY and ANR. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER

TDS collected but not deposited – prosecution - demand raised by treating the Company as the assessee in default – Company plea is that prosecution proceeding can be initiated only against those persons who were managing the affairs of company during ......

2008 (3) TMI 300 - PATNA HIGH COURT

OM PRAKASH KATYAL AND OTHERS Versus UNION OF INDIA

Tax collected at source not deposited to credit of Central Govt. within due date – Directors cannot be responsible for the default in deposit of the TDS amount – prosecution was to be quashed against the petitioners (directors) ......

2007 (8) TMI 200 - HIGH COURT, BOMBAY

A. SHENOY AND CO. AND OTHERS Versus N. D. KADAM, ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX AND OTHERS

Offences and prosecution - Revenue alleged that assessee-firm committed an offences by not deducting tax at source while interest payment to creditors and liable for prosecution u/s 276B but assessee contended that after change of law failure to dedu ......

2007 (7) TMI 7 - HIGH COURT , BOMBAY

Yashpal Sahni Versus 1. Rekha Hajarnavis, 2. K. C. Meena, 3. Tarkeshwar Singh, 4. K. M. Verma, 5. The Union of India, 6. Lan Eseda Industries Ltd.

Where the employer deduct TDS from the salary of employee, whether the revenue can recover the said amount of TDS with interest from the concerned employee? It was held that revenue can not collect TDS from the employee directly. Bar contained in sec ......

2007 (3) TMI 205 - SUPREME Court

Madhumilan Syntax Limited And Others Versus Union of India And Another

Failure to credit TDS to the Central Government as required by section 276B - The appellants had thus committed an offence punishable under section 278B - We may not be understood to have expressed any opinion one way or the other on the merits and a ......

2006 (12) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT, BOMBAY

UNION OF INDIA Versus GUPTA BUILDERS P. LTD. AND OTHERS

Offence and prosecution - Assessee fail to make the payment of tax deducted at source to the credit of CG within the prescribed time - HC held that nature of offence was continuing and for such no notice necessary and no time limit for launching pros ......

2006 (11) TMI 185 - DELHI HIGH COURT

1. SUSHIL SURI AND OTHERS, 2. SANJAY SURI Versus STATE AND OTHERS

Default in depositing TDS – offence – summoning order - held that a Managing Director was a “principal officer” of a company and that if he signs and verifies a return on behalf of the company which later turns out to be false, he would be liable – t ......

2005 (3) TMI 80 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court

Vijaysingh Versus Union Of India And Another.

Conviction u/s 276B - Failure to deposit the amount of tax deducted at source within the period prescribed - First Additional Sessions Judge vide impugned judgment allowed the appeal of the co-accused and acquitted them, however, dismissed the appeal ......

2005 (3) TMI 39 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court

Income-Tax Officer Versus Shiv Sewak Cotton Co. And Others.

Offence and Prosecution - discharging the accused - ITO, has filed the instant petition under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, for setting aside the order passed by the Sessions Judge whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner a ......

2004 (1) TMI 7 - SUPREME Court

K. C. Builders And Another Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax

Once the finding of concealment and subsequent levy of penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Act has been struck down by the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer has no other alternative except to correct his order under section 154 of the Act as per t ......

2003 (6) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court

Shaw Wallance And Co. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Income-tax (TDS) And Others (No. 1).

By this writ application the writ petitioner has prayed for setting aside the decision to initiate prosecution against the petitioner under section 276B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – maintainability - I make it clear that I have not gone into the mer ......

2003 (2) TMI 31 - BOMBAY High Court

Homo Phiroze Ranina And Others Versus State Of Maharashtra And Others.

Offences and prosecution - Unless the complaint disclosed a prima facie case against the applicants/accused of their liability and obligation as principal officers in the day-to-day affairs of the company as directors of the company under section 278 ......

 
   
 
 
 

 

what is new what is new

Subscription UpdatesNewslettersCommunicationOther Options




Go To Top

Go to Mobile Website

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.