New User / Register || Book Marks || Annual Subscription || Feed Back ||
Login: Stay
|| Forget Password ||
     
TMI - Tax Management India. Com  

Recent Discussionss:

Canteen Service Provider Applicability of Notificaton 218/86 S TAX DEDUCTION Second hand equipment with EPCG Licence IS SALES TAX / VAT APPLICABLE FOR TRANSPORTERS. Clearance of goods to 100% EOU Unit in SEZ under ARE3 -Reg. Service tax applicability on Directors remuneration valuation of goods and ED on scrap Two companies in different states Import of Service i.e. Payment to architect of Dubai for construction of House in India

Service Tax Case Laws

 

Advanced Search options


Filter -


 
Showing 1 to 15 of 10109 Records

    2014 (4) TMI 688 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    TACO FAURECIA DESIGN CENTER PVT LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE-III

    Denial of refund claim - Bar of limitation - Held that:- in the case of export of service during the impugned period the relevant date is the date of receipt of the payment towards the service exported. As the appellant has filed the refund claim in ......

    2014 (4) TMI 687 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    Chettinadu Constructions Versus Commissioner of Central Excise (ST), Madurai

    Commercial and industrial construction service - construction work undertaken for educational institutions - Revenue submitted that the institution for which construction activity was being undertaken was collecting substantial fees for providing edu ......

    2014 (4) TMI 686 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    M/s. AVM Projection Service Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai

    Waiver of pre-deposit of tax - Projection theatre under the category of Renting of Immovable Property - Held that:- Section 65(90a) of Finance Act, 1994 renting of immovable property includes renting, letting, leasing, licensing or other similar arra ......

    2014 (4) TMI 685 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    M/s. AVM TELEKOM Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai

    Waiver of pre deposit - business of marketing telecom services - Incentive for work done - Applicant claim that these incentives were to be paid to the staff of the applicant, hence not liable to service tax - Held that:- Prima facie, we feel that th ......

    2014 (4) TMI 684 - CESTAT CHENNAI

    NLC Indcoserve Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Puducherry

    Waiver of predeposit of interest - demand of interest - appellant submitted that they have erroneously paid the tax on reimbursement of administrative charges which is not warranted - man power recruitment or supply agency services - Held that:- app ......

    2014 (4) TMI 640 - CESTAT BANGALORE

    M/s Sai Service Station Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax

    Demand of service tax - Classification of service - business auxiliary service - Exchange of old cars for new cars - Whether this service can be considered as sale - Held that:- the property is delivered and the price has been received by the seller ......

    2014 (4) TMI 639 - CESTAT BANGALORE

    ADECCO PEOPLE ONE INDIA LIMITED Versus CCE, BANGALORE(ADJN)

    Demand of service tax - manpower recruitment agency services - Penalty u/s 76, 77, 78 - Held that:- appellants had produced a list of customers to whom they had provided service and who were exporting of their services and some of their customers had ......

    2014 (4) TMI 638 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    M/s ACC LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI

    Demand of service tax - Consulting Engineers Service - Undervaluation - Held that:- In the absence of documentary evidence, there cannot be any presumption in favour of the appellant that the consideration received was for other than the Consulting ......

    2014 (4) TMI 637 - CESTAT MUMBAI

    M/s TATA AIG LIFE INSURANCE CO LTD and others Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI & THANE-II

    Demand of service tax - Insurance Auxiliary Service - whether the appellant can utilize CENVAT Credit available with them for payment of service tax - Held that:- only change in the legal provision is the omission of Explanation under Rule 2(p). An E ......

    2014 (4) TMI 597 - Karnataka High Court

    Commissioner Versus Tribhuvan Motors Ltd.

    Demand of service tax - business auxiliary services - whether the activity carried on by the assessee falls within the definition on ‘business auxiliary services’ - Held that:- Following decision of Commissioner of Service Tax v. M/s. Scott Wilson Ki ......

    2014 (4) TMI 596 - Karnataka High Court

    Commissioner Versus VS. Patil

    Penalty u/s 78 - Tribunal without exercising jurisdiction u/s 80 reduced penalty to 25% - Held that:- When the duty and penalty is paid even before an order passed by the adjudicating authority the second proviso applies and the penalty payable is on ......

    2014 (4) TMI 589 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s. Vishal Packaging Versus CCE, Raipur

    Demand of service tax - Manufacture of corrugated boxes from craft paper on job work basis - Business Auxiliary services - Held that:- There is no dispute about the nature of the activity of the appellant - making corrugated boxes from craft paper on ......

    2014 (4) TMI 588 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

    M/s RELIGARE SECURITIES LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, DELHI

    Valuation - inclusion of Delayed Payment Charges (DPC) - Whether the DPC collected by the appellants from their clients in those cases where the appellants have already made payments to the Exchange but has not recovered the same from their clients, ......

    2014 (4) TMI 587 - CESTAT BANGALORE

    Mantri Developers Pvt Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax - Hyderabad-iv

    Construction residential complex - Works contract - Assessee pays Vat as well as Service tax - Composition scheme - Held that:- definition of works contract in Section 65(105)(zzzza) clearly covers construction of new residential complex or a part th ......

    2014 (4) TMI 571 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

    M/s UNITED PHOSPHORUS LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, SURAT-II

    Denial of cenvat credit - distribution of credit by the head office as ISD - The lower authority felt that the amount of credit availed by the appellant is ineligible as head office has availed and service tax paid based upon photo copies of debit no ......

   
 
1.... ..
 
 

 

what is new what is new

UpdatesKnowledge SharingSubscription CommunicationNewslettersMore Options




Go to Mobile Website Go To Top
© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.