Article Section |
|
Home Articles Income Tax CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI - Income Tax Experts This
|
Submit New Article
|
|
|
Income Tax - Articles By: CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI |
Showing 161 to 180 of 715 Records |
|
|
Proceedings/ appeal can continue against struck off companies. However, revenue un-necessarily filed appeal before the Supreme Court, against judgment AND ORDER of High Court of Rajasthan
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
April 8, 2019
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
S.68 NRA iron and Steel P. Ltd. (SC) - A fit case for recall and reconsideration by the Supreme Court to avoid miscarriage of justice and in justice in future.
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
March 26, 2019
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Reassessment in case of original assessment u.s. 143.1.a. Not allowed in absence of reasons recorded by AO and to make roving enquiry etc.
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
March 5, 2019
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Initial Depreciation Allowance u.s. 32.1.iia – is in nature of incentive- liberal and purpose seeking interpretation is required to achieve purpose in totality
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 15, 2019
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
VERY QUICK DISPOSAL AFTER TRIBUNAL AND QUICK DISPOSAL BY TRIBUNAL- A LEARNING FOR OTHER COURTS AND SOME SUGGESTIONS
1 Comment
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 5, 2019
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
ITAT- Adjournment of hearing - notice through cause list is not proper – proper communication of date of hearing and reasonable opportunity of hearing are precondition to render justice.
1 Comment
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 4, 2019
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Carry forward of loss should be allowed liberally.
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
January 31, 2019
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Mandatory levy of fees for delay in filing of Return and statements etc. being in nature of penalty is not justified.
|
|
By: - DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
January 9, 2019
|
|
All Articles by:
DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
S.115JB must be discontinuied as soon as possible in view of changed circumstances and also to avoid un-constitutional provisions
|
|
By: - DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
December 31, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Learning from judgment of Madras High Court in case of M. Sougoumarin v. Asstt. CIT- do not take legal provisions about cash transactions carelessly and also prepare case seriously taking all facts and contentions.
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
December 27, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
INTEREST SHOULD BE ON THE BASIS OF INCOME AS PER RETURN OF INCOME - a point of view with reasoning
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
December 12, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
CIRCULARS- WHY THEY ARE NOT FOLLOWED EVEN BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT AND LITIGATION IS CONTINUED? BRAIN DRAIN IN UN-NECESSARY LITIGATION MUST COME TO AN END
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
December 5, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
EVERYONE NEED TO BE CONCERNED TO SAVE ENVIORNMENT BY OPTIMISING USAGES AND AVOIDING WASTAGE OF MOST OF THINGS AND SERVICES
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
November 28, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Un-necessary long-drawn litigation by revenue on petty matters resulting into loss of public money and brain drain which is not in interest of society at large
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
November 27, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Employees contributions- S. 2.24.x , 36.1.va and 43B addition challenged in WP and considered by Madras High Court – improper course and actions by all
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
November 3, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Section 43B- claim as per proviso is a privilege and option of assesse
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
October 30, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
ROI- due date in case of partner of firm liable to tax audit S.139 – words ‘ a partner’ need to be substituted in place of ‘a working partner’ in provisions , meanwhile a circular is desirable
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
October 10, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
ITAT- Fees payable for appeal against order of CIT(A) before ITAT in form 36 - some issues and related aspects on fees and service by way of justice
|
|
By: - DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
October 8, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
ITAT- practical aspect: Apply for grounds of appeal of Revenue, if not received with notice of filing of appeal/ first notice for hearing of appeal, as the case may be.
1 Comment
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
October 1, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Portfolio Management Fees is allowable expenditure
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
September 27, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
............ |
|