Article Section |
|
Home Articles Income Tax CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI - Income Tax Experts This
|
Submit New Article
|
|
|
Income Tax - Articles By: CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI |
Showing 201 to 220 of 715 Records |
|
|
Time to re-think in changed times: Business head for activity of letting out properties to tax real income is most appropriate.
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
March 20, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
E-ITR FORM MUST HAVE OPTIONAL SHEETS FOR EXPLANATIONS AND FURTHER CLAIMS FOR CONSIDERATION BY AO
|
|
By: - DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
March 19, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
E-hearing must be in true sense and complete manner by tax authorities
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
March 14, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
SUGGESTION FOR OPTION TO ASSESSEE FOR HIGHER AND LOWER TDS/TCS for optimization of tax collection and refunds
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
March 13, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
“The cost of acquisition” is a definite sum incurred to acquire capital asset- the judgment of Punjab and Hariyana High Court (FB)** appears to be contrary to law ans settled legal position - deserve to be reviewed.
|
|
By: - DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
March 7, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Tax department must have respect of taxpayers -estimated disallowance of expenses in case of professionally managed companies- a serious issue.
|
|
By: - DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
March 6, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Income Tax Officer, Etawah Versus Dharam Narain 2018 (2) TMI 1474 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA – a reconsideration after proper presentation of parties is required
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 28, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Concept of deemed dividend and tax thereon must be discontinued as it appears not effective.
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 9, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Depreciation - Reduction of higher rates of 100, 80, 60 and 50% to 40% in a single stroke –amendment is not justified
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
January 31, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Read S. 68 of IT Act with NI Act: Provisions relating to cheque in the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 need to be considered in context of S.68 of Income-tax Act, 1961 – a reading again and reconsideration of some judgments allowing invocation of S. 68 for receipts by cheque is desirable
1 Comment
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
January 31, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Section 2.22.e deemed dividend though cheque was not deposited but returned and cancelled - un-necessary litigation by revenue
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
January 27, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
LETTER TO AO – ACCEPTING ADDITION TO AVOID LITIGATION
1 Comment
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
January 17, 2018
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Revenue friendly amendments must be prospective- revenue must not un-necessarily indulge into litigation by applying retrospectivity.
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
December 30, 2017
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Charitable Institutions: Depreciation is allowable as per general rules as well as per Income-tax Act. Allowed even when purchase of assets was considered as application of income
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
December 27, 2017
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Recent Instruction about expanding scope of scrutiny and some related issues- limitation to serve notice for expanded scrutiny
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
December 18, 2017
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
ITBA – suggestion -1
E-Filing portal - Income Tax Business Application (ITBA) module – suggestion to provide for uploading of zip file. Rar file etc.
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
December 14, 2017
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
S.43B -Un-necessary litigation by revenue an appeal before the Supreme Court on an issue which was well settled. S.43B must be omitted from the Income-tax Act
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
December 12, 2017
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
The observations in the Judgment of the Supreme Court in case of Gemini Distilleries about Circular- a case of improper reliance of Circular having vital difference
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
December 11, 2017
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Section 79 – carry forward of loss- information in ITR – Schedule CFL is only informative and does not amount to a claim
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
November 8, 2017
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
TDS IS PART OF SUM PAYABLE TO PAYEE and is trading liability- interest paid for delayed deposit of TDS is allowable expenditure
|
|
By: - CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
October 13, 2017
|
|
All Articles by:
CA DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
............ |
|