New User / Register | Bookmarks | Annual Subscription | Feedback |
Login: Stay
| Forget Password |
TMI - Tax Management India. Com  

Home Case Index 2012 (11) TMI Income Tax Tri Income Tax + Tri
← Previous Next →

Please login.

Only paid members can access this page.

User Login
Stay sign in
New User / Registeration
Forget Password - Click here to Retrieve

Buy this Document - Rs. 500/- only - or - Subscribe Annual Package

Shri Subhrajee Mallick, Prop. M/s. BPL. Distributors Versus Income-tax Officer, Ward-2, Paradeep. - 2012 (11) TMI 137 - ITAT CUTTACK - Income Tax

......... herefore was not the basis for the assessee who filed returns according to the audit report u/s.44AB. Therefore, the initiation of proceedings u/s.147 having been initiated by the Assessing Officer for the reason the assessee having violated the provisions of Section 44AF was not at all correct in view of the audit report furnished by the assessee, in our considered view the assessment orders and also the consequential penalty orders for both the AYs under consideration cannot be sustained. The learned CIT(A) having not considered this aspect of the case in its right prospective, his orders confirming the assessment orders and also the consequential penalty orders passed by the Assessing Officer also cannot be sustained. We, therefore, set aside the impugned orders of the learned CIT(A) by quashing the impugned assessment orders and cancelling the consequential penalty orders for both the AYs under consideration. 7. In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed.


what is new what is new

Updates Knowledge Sharing Subscription Communication Newsletters More Options

Quick Links: | Acts and Rules | Notifications | Circulars | Schedules | Tariff | Forms | Case Laws | Manuals |
| Home | About us | Contact us | Feed Back | Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Members | |
Go to Mobile Website Go To Top
© [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.