New User / Register || Book Marks || Annual Subscription || Feed Back ||
Login: Stay
|| Forget Password ||
     
TMI - Tax Management India. Com  

Recent Discussionss:

Service tax applicability on Directors remuneration valuation of goods and ED on scrap Two companies in different states Import of Service i.e. Payment to architect of Dubai for construction of House in India Service Tax Payment on GTA Second hand equipment with EPCG Licence Necessity of RD 23 D Export goods from other manufacturer Payment Made in Wrong Code TDS Payment done 94C instead of 94J
Home Case Index 2013 (8) TMI Customs Tri Customs + Tri
← Previous Next →

Please login.

Only paid members can access this page.

User Login
Username  
Password  
 
Stay sign in
 
 
 
New User / Registeration
Forget Password - Click here to Retrieve

Buy this Document - Rs. 500/- only - or - Subscribe Annual Package



M/s. Vanaik Spinning Mills Ltd. Versus CC, Amritsar - 2013 (8) TMI 727 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - Customs

Benefit of Notification No.102/2007 - Refund of SAD - no excise duty was collected in the invoices because BED is nil, hence no declaration was made on the Invoice that no credit of additional duty was taken - Held that - every restriction, stipulation condition as well as limitation prescribed by the Notification was to be scrupulously followed to avail benefit of notification Court followed the judgements of State of Jharkhand Ors vs. Ambay Cem........


 

what is new what is new

UpdatesKnowledge SharingSubscription CommunicationNewslettersMore Options


Go to Mobile Website Go To Top
© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.