New User / Register | Bookmarks | Annual Subscription | Feedback |
Login: Stay
| Forget Password |
           
TMI - Tax Management India. Com  

Recent Discussionss:

Section 51 of income tax Cenvat Credit SAILED ON DATE CERTIFICATE OR MATE RECEIPT Requirement CST on Air Freight Valuation of Jobwork when material dicrectly supplied by principal manufacturer Merchant Export Notification 20/2014 dt.11-07-2014 TNVAT ITC reversal for CST 2% sales - VAT - CST - GST clarification regarding service tax credit on manpower service
Home Case Index 2013 (9) TMI Central Excise HC Central Excise + HC
← Previous Next →

Please login.

Only paid members can access this page.

User Login
Username  
Password  
 
Stay sign in
 
 
 
New User / Registeration
Forget Password - Click here to Retrieve

Buy this Document - Rs. 500/- only - or - Subscribe Annual Package


HABIB AGRO INDUSTRIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MYSORE - 2013 (9) TMI 904 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT - Central Excise

......... he appeals were filed. The reason shown cannot be considered as unreasonable. There does not appear to be any deliberate latches or neglect on the part of the authorised representative to file the appeals. In that view, the order of the Tribunal is set aside the matter is remanded back to the Tribunal. 3. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed off. The proceedings have been described as writ petitions. The Registry is directed to describe the proceedings as writ appeals vide Section 35(G) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.



 

what is new what is new

UpdatesKnowledge SharingSubscription CommunicationNewslettersMore Options


Quick Links: | Acts and Rules | Notifications | Circulars | Schedules | Tariff | Forms | Case Laws | Manuals |
| Home | About us | Contact us | Feed Back | Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Members | |
Go to Mobile Website Go To Top
© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.