Advanced Search options
Showing 101 to 120 of 51921 Records
Central Excise - Case Laws
.. ........ ..
2014 (8) TMI 220 - CESTAT MUMBAI
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Versus M/s INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD
Valuation of goods - related parties / inter-connected undertaking - transaction value with the Oil Marketing Companies (OMC) - Held that - in case of BCPL 2009 (6) TMI 166 - CESTAT, MUMBAI it was held that, IPP based price cannot be considered as tr ......
2014 (8) TMI 219 - CESTAT MUMBAI
M/s HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX
Denial of CENVAT Credit - whether CENVAT credit of services like document processing charges paid by the appellant is admissible or otherwise - Held that - The services of document processing are availed by the appellant for processing of export rela ......
2014 (8) TMI 218 - CESTAT NEW DELHI
M/s. Warm Forging (P) Ltd. Versus CCE, Jaipur-I
Denial of CENVAT Credit - description of the goods was changed from wire rods to steel rods or steel rounds alongwith the change in tariff entry - Imposition of penalty - Held that - During the course of further investigation the statement of Shri Vi ......
2014 (8) TMI 217 - CESTAT MUMBAI
KANADE ANAND UDYOG PVT LTD. Versus CCE, MUMBAI
Denial of CENVAT Credit - credit has been denied on the ground that capital goods on which the credit has been taken were neither found to be received in the factory nor reflected in the IT returns in Form 3CD and the balance sheet - Held that - On a ......
2014 (8) TMI 216 - CESTAT MUMBAI
FOREVER LIVING PRODUCTS (INDIA) PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
Valuation - labelling of goods has to be undertaken in bond prior to ex-bond clearances - Whether the excise duty demanded on the basis of MRP is a revenue neutral exercise inasmuch as the appellant has discharged CVD liability on the imported goods ......
2014 (8) TMI 215 - CESTAT BANGALORE
Commissioner of Central Excise, COCHIN Versus SCOOBEE DAY PRODUCTS (P) LTD.
Valuation of goods - Addition of advertisement expenses incurred by Kitex to the assessable value of the goods cleared by the appellants on the ground that the price was not the sole consideration and advertisement expenses is to be considered as dev ......
2014 (8) TMI 186 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD
CCE Ahmedabad-II Versus M/s Reclamation Welding Ltd.
Valuation of goods - Job work - Revenue argued that assessable value in such cases should be based on the raw material cost plus job charges plus profit of the job worker as per settled position of law - Held that - Valuation of goods manufactured in ......
2014 (8) TMI 185 - CESTAT NEW DELHI
Kalindi Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE., Raipur
Clandestine removal of goods - sponge iron - Discrepancy in stock found - Goods cleared without payment of duty - Held that - Dip reading method adopted by the officers lead to wrong assessment of weight of the sponge iron and the allegation of the c ......
2014 (8) TMI 184 - CESTAT BANGALORE
Brahmos Aerospace Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax Hyderabad - II
Valuation of goods - supply of missiles and other products - Inclusion of documentation expenses, NRE, project management, training and training aids and Hub extension supplied to army - Notification No. 64/95 CE dated 16.03.95 - appellants have clai ......
2014 (8) TMI 183 - CESTAT KOLKATA
M/s MUKUND FOODS PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA-IV
Waiver of pre-deposit - short payment of duty - difference in the production figures shown in the RT-12 returns and the data reflected in respective balance sheets - Held that - figures mentioned in the balance sheet were incorrect inasmuch as there ......
2014 (8) TMI 182 - CESTAT CHENNAI
CCE, Salem Versus M/s. Sakthi Sugars Ltd.
Denial of CENVAT Credit - Commissioner remanded matter back as no reason for denial is stated in SCN - Held that - Tribunal in the case of Honda Seil Power Products Ltd. (2013 (3) TMI 303 - CESTAT NEW DELHI), after considering the decisions of the Ho ......
2014 (8) TMI 181 - CESTAT CHENNAI
ECOF INDUSTRIES PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & ST
Waiver of predeposit of duty - difference between the quantity issued to production and the quantity emerging as finished goods - Held that - From the SCN that there is variation of percentage of loss year wise. The percentage of loss during the reta ......
2014 (8) TMI 180 - CESTAT MUMBAI
M/s ULTRA TECH CEMENT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
Denial of CENVAT Credit - input credit on cement received in their factory - difference of weighment shown in the invoice and actually done in assessees factory - Held that - Appellant have taken the credit on the basis of invoices issued by the supp ......
2014 (8) TMI 179 - CESTAT MUMBAI
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Versus SUNIL INDUSTRIES (P) LTD
Denial of refund claim - Suo moto credit - assessee held as entitled to take CENVAT Credit of duty already paid - Instead of taking credit assessee filed refund claim - Held that - In this case, in-spite of opting for taking suo motu credit the respo ......
2014 (8) TMI 178 - CESTAT NEW DELHI
M/s GENUS PAPER PRODUCTS LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT
Clandestine removal of goods - Discrepancy in stock - non accounting of finished goods in RG-1 register - Held that - shortage by itself is no indication of clandestine removal. Mere payment of duty, to buy peace with the department, does not lead to ......
2014 (8) TMI 177 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD
M/s VAPI PAPER MILLS LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DAMAN AND VICE VERSA
Imposition of penalties - Violation the provisions of Rule 8 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Held that - Appellant-assessee has paid the amount through PLA along with interest. If the said duty liability which has been fastened on him for making paym ......
2014 (8) TMI 153 - CESTAT BANGALORE
M/s Zurai Cements Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Tirupahi
Clearance cement in bags without affixing MRP to contractors engaged in construction activity - Exemption under Sl. No. 1C of the Notification No. 4/2006-C.E. dated 1.3.2006 - mis-declaration of the category of consumers - demand of differential duty ......
2014 (8) TMI 138 - CESTAT MUMBAI
M/s MUKUND INDUSTRIES PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
Utilization of ineligible CENVAT Credit - default in terms of Rule 8(3A) - Interest - Penalty u/s 11AC - excise duty beyond the permissible period of time of 30 days - Utilization of credit after permissible period - Held that - If the duty liability ......
2014 (8) TMI 137 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD
M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. Versus CCE. & ST. - Rajkot
Demand of differential duty - Determination of correct assessable value - excisable goods cleared by M/s. RIL to their own units situated elsewhere in the country - clearances made to assessees own unit by determining value based on the assessable va ......
2014 (8) TMI 136 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD
M/s United Phosphorous Ltd. Versus CCE&ST., Surat I
Waiver of pre-deposit of penalty - contravention of the provisions of Central Excise Act and the Rules - Held that - On perusal of the records, it is observed that there is no dispute as to the discharge of differential duty liability and interest th ......
.. ........ ..