|| New User || My profile || My Book Marks || SMS Services || Annual Subscription || Lost Password ||
Stay
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Reopening of assessment - The prime requirement for the validity of a notice issued under section 148 is that the reasons recorded should have a live link or nexus with the material on record. - HC There is no need to discuss provisions of sections 70, 71 & 32(2) elaborately as the CIT erred in coming to the conclusion that current year's depreciation cannot be allowed to be set off against capital gains. - Tri Residential status - foreign going vessel - he was outside Indian territory for 230 days and the requirement of section 6 for being outside India for 182 days, he become 'non-resident'. - Tri Transfer of the merchant banking business - nature of the transfer does not attract the provision of section 50B in relation to slump sale also as there is no transfer of an undertaking by the assessee. - Tri Bad debts / business loss - The loans given to staff has been written off since the same are irrecoverable in view of transfer of the merchant banking business. - deduction allowed - Tri U.P. Value Added Act, 2008 - every dealer holding registration certificate under the erstwhile Act, as a dealer, is deemed to be registered under the new Act - non-obtaining of biometrics data, as in the instant case, will not invalidate the registration certificate. - HC Petitioner is not personally liable to pay the outstanding dues under the U.P. Trade Tax/Sales Tax Act of the Private Limited Company but under CST he is liable to pay the dues - HC Refund claim denied - period of limitation - cause of action arose only on 15/11/06, when they paid for the second time as a result of audit objection - refund claim is withing period - Tri Rejection of Refund claim – appellant filed under protest letter on 7.1.1987. - after two days they filed six nos. classification lists - thus, the under protest letter has no effect in the eye of law - Tri An educational qualification recognized by law will not cease to be recognized by law merely because for practicing in the field to which the qualification relates, a further examination held by a body regulating that field of practice is to be taken. - HC Fulfillment of export obligation – it is not open to the customs authorities to presume that extension of the LOP would be granted by the Development Commissioner to facilitate evasion of duty. - HC Merely because the CIT is having a different view, the same would not entitle him to initiate revision proceedings u/s 263, if the view taken by the assessing officer is one of the possible views. - Tri Repayment of capital balance in cash would not attract the provisions of sec. 269T since it does not constitute loan or deposit. - Tri Penalty u/s 271E - violation of sec. 269T - the interest amount and the principal amount were paid in two different occasions - each amoount less then Rs. 20,000 - No penalty - Tri Disallowance under section 14A required finding of incurring of expenditure and where it was found that for earning exempted income no expenditure had been incurred, disallowance under section 14A could not stand. - Tri Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - non deduction of TDS - If the element of income cannot be established, provisions of section 40(a)(ia) cannot be invoked - Tri Gift of immovable property - assessee's brothers and mother have gifted their 1/8th undivided share - very heavy burden lies on the department to prove that it is not the real one - Tri Addition on account of negative stock - The quantitative details as submitted duly explained that there was no negative stock in any of the month. - Tri    Left Stop Right

Please login.

Only paid members can access this page.

User Login
Username  
Password  
 
Stay sign in
 
 
 
New User / Registeration
Forget Password - Click here to retrieve your Password

 

2012 (1) TMI 56 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI
CCE (ICD), New Delhi Versus M/s Infres Methodex Ltd.

Power of Commissioner(Appeals) to remand the matter u/s 122A of the Customs Act, 1962 - refund claim – Held that:- The power to remand the matter is specifically withdrawn u/s 122(A) of the Customs Act, 1962 and it is also upheld in case of Mil India Ltd. vs. CCE (2007 - TMI - 1196 - Supreme Court Of India). Thus, the impugned order is not sustainable.

It is found that claim of refund was rejected by the adjudicating authority and documents produced before the Commissioner (Appeals) requires verification. Therefore, the matter is remanded to the adjudicating authority who will decide the matter afresh after taking into consideration the documents produced by the respondent. Appeal is disposed of by way of remand.

 
what is new what is new
Advanced Search
Subscription
Annual Subscription
Consultancy Services
Modes of Payment
Updates
Highlights
Recent Case Laws
Recent Notifications
Recent Circulars
Event Calendar
Articles
News / Feeds
Experts
Newsletters
FAQ - Newsletters
Archive - Newsletters
Communication
Contact - Us
Feedback / Suggestion
Other Options
Compute Income Tax
Refer to Friend
Important Links
Advertise with us
Quick Links: || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Forms || Case Laws || Members ||
| Home | | About us | | Contact us | | Refer us | | Feed Back | | Disclaimer | | Terms of Use | | Privacy Policy | | Discussion Forum |
Go To Top

Go to Mobile Website

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.