Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2005 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (9) TMI 226 - AT - Income TaxCredit of tax deducted at source - Mercantile system of accounting - business of providing security and housekeeping services to different clientele - difference of opinion between the Members - Third Member Order - Whether, the learned CIT(A) is justified in confirming the addition, made by the Assessing Officer in respect of 3 TDS certificates pertaining to the period 1-4-1996 to 31-3-1997 issued to the assessee by RCF? - HELD THAT:- The assessee, in this case, is following mercantile system of accounting. All expenses, to which liability is accrued in the accounting year, are deductible as business expenditure. In the same manner all business receipts will have to be determined on the basis of method of accounting employed by the assessee. Unless the assessee renders services for the entire month, it is not open to him to raise the bill upon his clientele. In other words, some of the services rendered in March 1997 will have to be necessarily billed after the close of the month which falls outside the accounting year under consideration and, in fact, the assessee has billed the same immediately after the close of the accounting year, in the month of April 1997 which is subsequent to the previous year for the year under consideration and has treated the same as part of business receipts for the next assessment year. I do not think that there is any flaw in this method of accounting regularly employed by the assessee and accepted by the department from year to year in the past. After all, the TDS certificates which are again dated and received in the months subsequent to the accounting year cannot be accounted in the assessment year under consideration, which has already been closed. It is not necessary for the assessee to account those receipts by re-opening the books of account of the earlier year because the assessee himself has raised the bills in the subsequent month after the close of the accounting year in question. Therefore, it is incorrect on the part of the revenue to workout any addition, on the basis of the bills subsequently raised, in the accounting year which has already passed wherein according to the method of accounting employed by the assessee, such receipts have not been recognized as part of business profits. It may be mentioned that sections 198 and 199 do not in any way change the year of assessability of income, which depends upon the method of accounting regularly employed by the assessee. They only deal with the year in which the credit has to be given by the Assessing Officer. It cannot be disputed that according to the method of accounting employed by the assessee the income in respect of the three TDS Certificates, which are mentioned in paragraph 3 above, does not pertain to the assessment year in question, but it pertains to the next assessment year and, in fact, in that year the assessee has offered the same to tax. Therefore, the credit in respect of these three TDS Certificates shall not be given in the assessment year under consideration, but the credit for the same shall be given in the next assessment year in which the income is shown to have been assessed. Thus, I agree with the reasoning given by the learned Accountant Member, who has correctly directed the exclusion of the income represented by these three TDS Certificates from being assessed in the assessment year 1997-98, i.e., the year under consideration. But the assessee, in the light of the scheme of the provisions of sections 198 and 199 of the Act, shall not be allowed to claim the credit in respect of these TDS Certificates for which the income has not been returned by her as a result of the method of accounting employed. The credit shall be carried forward and the assessee will get the credit for the present TDS Certificate in the year in which she offers the income to tax on the basis of the method of accounting regularly employed. I think it is necessary for me to deal with certain observations regarding the claiming of the expenditure as discussed by the learned Judicial Member. The claim of deduction for an expenditure depends upon again the method of accounting regularly employed by the assessee. There is no dispute that the assessee has incurred these expenses even in respect of the services rendered to its clientele in the month of March, 1997 (to which the bills are not raised). These expenses have been undoubtedly incurred during the previous year in question. Only the matching receipts have not accrued to the assessee in the accounting year in question due to the method of accounting employed by her. But over the years, the effect on the Profit & Loss Account gets neutralized. Sections 198 and 199, it may again be stressed, do not in any way determine the year of assessability of profits and gains of business. They only deal with the year in which the TDS Certificates have to be given credit to. In my humble opinion, the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. [1997 (7) TMI 4 - SUPREME COURT] relied upon by the learned Judicial Member, does not in any way alter the year of assessability of income, which is governed under sections 28, 29 and 145 as has been interpreted by the Apex Court and as discussed. Thus, I am in agreement with the view expressed by the learned Accountant Member. The matter will now be placed before the regular Bench to dispose of the appeal in accordance with the opinion of the majority. The Hon'ble President has nominated Shri G.E. Veerabhadrappa, Vice-President (Mumbai Benches) as a Third Member to resolve the controversy. Shri G.E. Veerabhadrappa, Vice President, has since vide his Order dated 27-9-2005, has agreed with the view expressed by the learned Accountant Member, in his proposed order on this issue. Accordingly, inconformity with the majority view, we hold that the addition is deleted and it is further held that the assessee was not be allowed to claim credit in respect of the TDS certificates for which the income has not been returned by her as a result of the method of accounting employed. The credit shall be carried forward and the assessee will get the credit for the present TDS certificates in the year in which she offers the income taxed on the basis of the method of accounting regularly employed. The assessing authority is therefore directed to modify the assessment accordingly. In result, this appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed.
|