| Comments on Articles |
|
|
| |
| Article ID : 1589 |
Date: - 05-02-2012 |
|
Very interestng article on professional misconduct and on ethics in relation to Advocates. Thanks for updating everyone on recourse available if facts and circumstances so desire. |
|
__________________________________________________ |
|
| Article ID : 1582 |
Date: - 28-01-2012 |
|
Thanks for reply, I want share that sectin 67(2) is applicable to both the category of person either Service provider or receipient of service liable to pay ST.
My question is : In case of service provider providing service to indian receipint without service tax, than benefit of cume tax value under section 67(2) is available. In this article so many case laws are available.
But, Why benefit of cum tax value is not available in case of import of service, as the section is applicable to Both the category of person?
There is no seperate section who are liable to pay ST under reverse charged machanizm, Unfortunatly, as per my knowledge, there is no case law in this regard.
Your expert view are sincerly awaited. |
|
__________________________________________________ |
|
| Article ID : 1582 |
Date: - 28-01-2012 |
|
This is depends the contract entred. the price is with out any tax applicable than we have to pay the service tax extra. otherwise we have to do calculate as mentioned and pay the service tax. .tks |
|
__________________________________________________ |
|
| Article ID : 1582 |
Date: - 27-01-2012 |
|
Dear Sir,
In case of reverse charge method, What happen if agreement is silent and if we make the payment of Rs. 1 lakh to foreign service provider, then we have to pay service tax on cum tax valuation (1 lakh * 10.30/110.30) or we have to pay service tax on Rs. 1 lakh (Rs.1 lakh * 10.30%ST)?
Please give your expert opinion and if possible pls. provide case law in case of ST is payable on cum tax valuation in case of reverse charged method.
|
|
__________________________________________________ |
|
| Article ID : 1581 |
Date: - 27-01-2012 |
|
Can we interpret that "content" has to be of the owner whihc is to be developed and/or supplied back to the owner. If yes, then, all coompanies like lexsite, TMI, D&B should not levy service tax under this category becuase content is not of the owner. |
|
__________________________________________________ |
|
| Article ID : 1566 |
Date: - 12-01-2012 |
|
What about the depreciation on the car used exclusively for the business? |
|
__________________________________________________ |
|
| Article ID : 1148 |
Date: - 12-01-2012 |
|
In case there is no associate concern and the assessee have entered into international transactions with other non associated concern then my question is, whether that assessee is required to obtain the report in form 3ECB.
|
|
__________________________________________________ |
|
| Article ID : 1442 |
Date: - 30-12-2011 |
|
If Demand order is passed u/s 156 rw 143(3) and in that order TDs credit given is less then can rectification can made u/s 154 or not. what will be the sollution.
If refund order is passed once can a Scrutiny notice u/s 143(2) can issued by the department ? |
|
__________________________________________________ |
|
| Article ID : 146 |
Date: - 14-11-2011 |
|
can belated service tax return be revised |
|
__________________________________________________ |
|
| Article ID : 146 |
Date: - 14-11-2011 |
|
can belated service tax return be revised |
|
__________________________________________________ |
|
| |
| |