New User / Register | Bookmarks | Annual Subscription | Feedback |
Login: Stay
| Forget Password |
           
TMI - Tax Management India. Com  

Recent Discussionss:

Cenvat Credit SAILED ON DATE CERTIFICATE OR MATE RECEIPT Requirement CST on Air Freight Valuation of Jobwork when material dicrectly supplied by principal manufacturer Merchant Export Notification 20/2014 dt.11-07-2014 TNVAT ITC reversal for CST 2% sales - VAT - CST - GST clarification regarding service tax credit on manpower service CENVAT CREDIT TO DEVELOPERS
 
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise Month 1 2011 2011 (1) This
← Previous Next →
 

Diffrent between Jobwork rule 214/86 and Rule4(5)(a) - Central Excise

 
Issue Id: - 2622
Dated: -08-01-2011
By:- aSandeep Upadhyay
Diffrent between Jobwork rule 214/86 and Rule4(5)(a)
Dear all experts Sending of More than one Inputs(after availment of cenvat credit) to Jobworker for further process and received processed goods to principle mfgr and princple Mfg sale it on payment of duty. What rule is apply for above procedure? Rule 4(5)(a) or rule 214/86.Required to submitt undertaking/ intimation to Jurisdictional asst.commissioner of Jobworker? for above procedure? Request to give guideline in this matter. Thanks Sandeep
Post Reply
 
Previous Posts


Dated: - 09-01-2011
By: - Sailapati Bhattacharyya

Main difference is that in Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, condition like intimation or permission, undertaking etc., are not attached; whereas in the Notification- 214/86-CE some condition has been attached.

 

Follow Rule 4(5)(a) of theCenvat Credit Rules, 2004, normally no undertaking, no intimation.


 
 
Previous Next

 

what is new what is new

UpdatesKnowledge SharingSubscription CommunicationNewslettersMore Options




Go to Mobile Website Go To Top
© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.