|| New User || My profile || My Book Marks || SMS Services || Annual Subscription || Lost Password ||
Stay
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Refund claim denied - period of limitation - cause of action arose only on 15/11/06, when they paid for the second time as a result of audit objection - refund claim is withing period - Tri Rejection of Refund claim – appellant filed under protest letter on 7.1.1987. - after two days they filed six nos. classification lists - thus, the under protest letter has no effect in the eye of law - Tri An educational qualification recognized by law will not cease to be recognized by law merely because for practicing in the field to which the qualification relates, a further examination held by a body regulating that field of practice is to be taken. - HC Fulfillment of export obligation – it is not open to the customs authorities to presume that extension of the LOP would be granted by the Development Commissioner to facilitate evasion of duty. - HC Merely because the CIT is having a different view, the same would not entitle him to initiate revision proceedings u/s 263, if the view taken by the assessing officer is one of the possible views. - Tri Repayment of capital balance in cash would not attract the provisions of sec. 269T since it does not constitute loan or deposit. - Tri Penalty u/s 271E - violation of sec. 269T - the interest amount and the principal amount were paid in two different occasions - each amoount less then Rs. 20,000 - No penalty - Tri Disallowance under section 14A required finding of incurring of expenditure and where it was found that for earning exempted income no expenditure had been incurred, disallowance under section 14A could not stand. - Tri Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - non deduction of TDS - If the element of income cannot be established, provisions of section 40(a)(ia) cannot be invoked - Tri Gift of immovable property - assessee's brothers and mother have gifted their 1/8th undivided share - very heavy burden lies on the department to prove that it is not the real one - Tri Addition on account of negative stock - The quantitative details as submitted duly explained that there was no negative stock in any of the month. - Tri Rate of tax on the sale of Copper Wire Bars and Copper Cathods - whether would be charged and retained @ 4% or 1% - chargeable at 1%. - HC Appeal u/s 483 – modification sought by the appellant is against the fabric of the Scheme and in the domain of modifications of the Scheme and not of modification for working of the Scheme. - non-compliance of Section 2(19AA), would not render the Scheme unworkable. - HC Since the Director of the appellant-company was actively involved in the day to day activity of the appellant-company penalty on him under Rule 26 has been correctly imposed. - Tri In absence of direct or indirect involvement of the Managing Director in the clandestine removal of the goods no personal penalty under Rule 26 is imposable on him. - Tri Cenvat Credit denied - galvanization does not amount to the manufacture - The duty paid on the G.P. Coils etc., is more than Cenvat Credit taken and needs to be adjusted against the demand of the Cenvat Credit. - Tri Extended period of limitation - in cases of intention to evade duty relevant date for computation of extended period for show cause is the date of knowledge - Tri Rejection of transaction value and enhancement of assessable value has to be on the basis of some evidences on record. - NIDB data cannot be made the basis for enhancement of value - Tri    Left Stop Right
 
Discussions Forum

Shares your views, knowledge and experience

Let others be enriched with your views, knowledge & experience

 
Previous Next
TDS on Salary
 
Issue Id: - 3970
Dated: -28-03-2012
By:- Pradeep Kaushik
TDS on Salary
Income Tax

Respected Sir,

This is regarding the calculation of taxable Salary. One employee joined our company in May 2011@ Rs. 60000/- per month. He resigned on 1 March 2012. during his tenure he got short salary due to deduction of Leave, In Sept 2011 Rs. 56000/- and in November 2011 Rs. 54000/-. So we Consider his taxable Salary for TDS purpose like 60000.00X10 or (60000X8+56000+54000). What Amount we have show in our Company's TDS Return.

Please Clarify.

Best Regards.

Pradeep kaushik

 
 
Previous Posts


Dated: - 28-03-2012
By: - GOPALJI AGRAWAL

Not the nominal salary but actual salary as per second formula.




Dated: - 30-03-2012
By: - meenakshi sundaram

Yes ..only the actual salary paid has to be taken into account....


 
 
Previous Next

 

what is new what is new

Subscription UpdatesNewslettersCommunicationOther Options




Go to Mobile Website

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.