1987 (6) TMI 216

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e revision application filed before the Government of India against the order bearing No. S/49-64/82L, dated 29-6-1982 passed by the Appellate Collector of Customs, Bombay statutorily stood transferred to the Tribunal for being heard as an appeal. 2. The undisputed facts are that the Dy. Collector by his order dated 31-12-1981 ordered confiscation of raw silk valued at Rs. 44,821/- on the ground .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... was against the quantum of fine. But then the Appellate Collector did not consider that aspect of the case. Shri Krishnamurthy urged that the goods imported at the relevant time were canalised item. The canalising agency had supplied the goods at the rate of Rs. 345 per kg. If that price be taken into consideration the market price of the imported goods works out to only Rs. 277.02 per kg. and th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rice of the imported goods. The order of the Dy. Collector nowhere indicates as to the market price of the imported goods at the relevant time. Even though a contention had been taken before the Appellate Collector he did not consider that aspect of the case. Thus, there is hardly any evidence as to the market price of the imported goods at the relevant time. In the circumstances, I allow this app .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X