Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1987 (9) TMI 290

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pellants are a composite mill manufacturing cotton fabrics falling under Item No. 19(1) of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule. During the period from 1-12-1972 to 30-10-1977, they utilised cotton fabrics of grey coarse and medium varieties out of their own production as back grey cloth for industrial purposes in the process of printing. It appears that the appellants failed to pay hand-loom cess on such clearances of back grey cloth. The appellants had also filed a separate claim for refund of handloom cess paid during the period from 5-3-1978 to 27-9-1980 on the ground that cess was not payable when the fabrics were removed for internal consumption. The Assistant Collector, on completion of adjudication proceedings, passed two orders, one .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rom the whole of the excise duty leviable thereon under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. This exemption is unconditional. In accordance with the provisions Government under clause (e) of Section 5(2) of the Khadi and other Handloom Industries Development (Additional Excise Duty on Cloth) Act, 1953 (Act No. 12 of 1953), the Central Government exempted from the additional excise duty leviable under the said Act (we shall refer to this duty as handloom cess) all varieties of cloth which were for the time being exempted from the excise duty leviable thereon under the Central Excises and Salt Act 1944. A proviso was inserted in this Notification on 7-7-1970 whereby the notification was made inapplicable to cotton fabrics of the following .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... true, as the appellants state, that anomalous results would perhaps follow this view because while medium A, medium B and coarse cotton fabrics would be denied the benefit of exemption from handloom cess, fine and superfine varieties would be exempt from the handloom cess. We do not know whether this is an intended result or an inadvertent result but it is not for us to speculate. In this view of the matter, the coarse, medium A and medium B cotton fabrics which are the subject matter in the present dispute would be liable to handloom cess. The appellants are liable to pay the cess subject to our earlier finding that the demand notice can be enforced only for the period of six months preceding the date of issue. Insofar as the refund claim .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates