Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1991 (12) TMI 189

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a refund of Rs. 5,188.00. 3. The facts are as follows : The respondents, M/s. Modella Woollens Ltd. are engaged in the manufacture of wool tops falling under Tariff Item 43 of the Central Excise Tariff. A show cause notice dated 1-2-1980 was issued proposing to demand a duty of Rs. 2,67,651.39 for the period from 1st September, 1977 to 17th January, 1980 on the ground that they have used 77662.5 kgs. duty paid pure wool tops and manufactured 1,16,584.0 of blended wool tops falling under Tariff Item 43 and cleared the blended tops without payment of duty. The respondents, in their reply, stated that the original wool tops made of 100 per cent wool as also those blended from them fall under the same Tariff Item 43 and once the duty was p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ector, by a common order, allowed the claim for refund of duty. Hence, the Department's appeal before us. 5. The main contention of Smt. Sundaram for the Department is that the Collector allowed the appeals relying on the order of this Tribunal in British India Corporation case (supra) which is not applicable to the facts of the case. Shri Asthana appearing for the respondents, contended that the issue is squarely covered by the said order. 6. To consider whether the issue is covered by the order in British India Corporation case, it is necessary to examine the said order-in-appeal. 7. Briefly, the facts in British India Corporation case are as follows : The issue involved was whether the appellants, namely, British India Corporatio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... itish India Corporation, continued to pay duty at the stage of pure wool tops only. The Board on 28-4-1981, reversed the order of Collector No. 12/80 and held that the duty is payable at the pure wool top stage. The said order was, again, reversed by the Central Government by its Order No. 430/82 of 1982, the result, by 20-7-1982, it was crystalised that the duty is payable only at the blended wool top stage and not at the pure wool stage. In spite of above, the British India Corporation went on paying duty at the wool top stage. Therefore, the impugned proceedings were initiated. The main question that was contended before the Tribunal was that the duty was paid only at the wool top stage and not at the blended wool top stage. The Tribunal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... invloved is 1-9-1977 to 17-1-1980 and during this period, the advice of the Finance Ministry and the Trade Notice No. 212/76 of Bangalore Collectorate was in force. In view of the Trade Notice and the advice of the Finance Ministry, the respondents were paying duty at the pure wool top stage. It is only on 3-12-1980, the Trade Notice changed the practice of payment of duty at blended wool top stage. Therefore, the observa tions made in Para 7 (iv) of the order of this Tribunal in British India Corporation, are squarely applicable and the demand should not be enforced and in our view the Collector is justified in setting aside the demand and granting the refund. 10. However, Smt. Sundaram, vehemently, opposed to the Collector's order relyi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ey were called upon by the Deptt. to deposit the duty payable at the blended wool top stage, they are not entitled to the relief. It is true that the respondents paid the duty when called upon, however, imme diately within the period of limitation they have filed the claim for refund of duty. Therefore, they were, throughout, maintaining that the duty was not payable at the blended wool top stage, but only at the pure wool top stage. Therefore, the fact that they have paid duty in 1977 does not in any way affect their right to claim the benefit of the order of this Tribunal in British India Corporation. 13. Shri Asthana contended that the show cause notice is barred by limitation. In the light of the views, which were taken, it is not nec .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates