2001 (2) TMI 394

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Justice K. Sreedharan, President]. When the stay application came up for orders, we heard the ld. Counsel representing the appellants and the ld. DR in detail. After perusing the records, we are disposing of the appeal itself without passing any separate order on stay petitions. 2. The appellants manufactures ayurvedic medicines. In respect of three products namely Panchphool Tel, Ghrit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... an appealable order. Hence the present appeal. 3. According to the ld. Counsel representing the appellants, a duty demand could have been made by the competent authority only pursuant to show cause notice. No show cause notice was issued demanding the duty and according to Counsel, no opportunity was afforded to the manufacturer to submit his defence to the demand made by the Superintendent in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X