TMI Blog2001 (5) TMI 416X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. All these applications are directed against Order-in-Original No. 35/2000, dated 1-11-2000 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur. Penalties have been imposed on the appellants under the order. These applications seek stay of recovery of the penalties. 2. The learned Counsel representing the applicants has submitted tha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lant had already deposited the entire duty amount payable on the goods and the penalty imposed on him. In the circumstances he sought waiver of the requirement for pre-deposit of penalties by the dealers and stay of the recovery of such penalties. 3. The learned DR representing the Revenue submitted that the duty evasion had taken place on account of a deliberate strategy of collecting amounts o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ances, we consider it an appropriate case for grant of waiver of pre-deposit of penalties imposed on these dealers. It is, accordingly, ordered that the Revenue shall not take any coercive action for the recovery of the amounts during the pendency of their appeals. The appeals of the present applicants shall be tagged with the main appeal i.e. E/185/2001-A filed by M/s. Mayur Industries Ltd. and a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
