TMI Blog1993 (2) TMI 260X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... J. This application under section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, has been filed by the petitioners. Petitioners Nos. 2 to 9 are directors and ex-directors of petitioner No. 1-company. The company was established for manufacturing, trading and/or dealing in wires, cables, lines of all kinds, conductors, mains, pipes, flexible cords, etc. In the application, detailed reasons have been given, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r a period of one year and six months from the date of the order. Notice of this petition was given to the Registrar of Companies, Rajasthan, Government of India and Government of Rajasthan. The notices were also sent by registered post. None of the non-petitioners has appeared, nor has any reply been filed on their behalf, in spite of service. When the earlier applications, mentioned above, were ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... I do not feel it necessary to burden this order with greater details, in view of the earlier order dated August 24, 1990, passed by this court, in which, necessary reasons and details have been given. The position continues to be the same I am therefore, of the opinion that in the circumstances, it is not possible or the non-petitioners to discharge the statutory obligations and it will be in the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
