TMI Blog2003 (12) TMI 420X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... m, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. After dispensing with the condition of pre-deposit, we take up the appeal itself, inasmuch as the issue is covered by the earlier decision of the Tribunal as also by the Board s Instructions. 2. Demand of Rs. 90,714.00 (Rupees ninety thousand seven hundred and fourteen) has been confirmed against the applicant/appella ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... personal penalty of Rs. 2,000.00 (Rupees two thousand) upon the appellant-company. Our attention has been drawn by Shri K.K. Acharya, learned Advocate, for the appellants, to a letter dated 12-2-87 written by the Under Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi, to the Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Bhubaneswar laying down that in respect ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|