TMI Blog1970 (3) TMI 127X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ld be rejected only because the written purchase order came into existence after the supplies, even though the supplies were made under an oral contract which was subsequently reduced to writing after the supplies had taken place and was described as the confirmatory purchase order in the declarations submitted? (2) (a) Whether the delay in filing second appeal can be condoned and the appeal adm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t, 1965. The appeal is to be filed within 60 days from the date of receipt of the order. If the date of receipt of the order is taken as 29th January, 1965, then clearly the appeal is barred by time. If on the other hand the date is taken to be 29th July, 1965, the appeal was not barred by time. The learned Tribunal came to the conclusion that the appeal was barred by time. On that footing the Sta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... yer for condonation. We would accordingly answer question (2)(a) by saying that the delay in filing the appeal cannot be condoned without giving notice to the respondent. It follows, as a logical corollary, that since the delay was condoned without giving the respondent an opportunity of being heard, he can re-agitate the matter after appearance, and ask the Tribunal, to get its order Since repo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
