TMI Blog2013 (6) TMI 14X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... - - - Dated:- 27-5-2013 - Rajiv Sharma And Dr. Satish Chandra,JJ. For the Appellant :- D. D. Chopra, Sanjeev Shankhdhar For the Respondent : Rohit Nandan Shukla ORDER Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the records. Through the instant appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act-1961, the appellant challenges the judgment and order dated 22.4.2009 passed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... I. Whether under the facts and in the circumstances of the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has erred in law in recalling their order dated 27.7.2007 without appreciating that recalling of order necessitates rehearing, re-adjudication and passing of fresh order. IV. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in recalling the order to con ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the revenue effect is less than Rs. 4,00,000/-. It has been pointed out by Mr. Shukla that the instruction issued by the Board fixing monetary limits for filing appeal and application for reference shall be deemed to have been issued under sub-section (1) of section 268A of the Income-tax Act in view of the provision made in section 268A(5) of the Act. Hence, according to Mr. Shukla, the instant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
