TMI Blog2013 (12) TMI 343X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e and in the light of the fact that the Tribunal’s order stand merged with the High Court and subsequently with the Apex Court order, the Tribunal has no powers to recall such orders - Following Commissioner of Customs vs. Lindt Exports [2011 (9) TMI 609 - DELHI HIGH COURT ] - when the order of the Tribunal dismissing appeals on account of non-deposit is upheld by Hon’ble High Court, the same is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the other two applicants Smt. Vijay Laxmi Shukla, Secretary and Shri Kamal Kant Shukla, President was dispensed with. 2. As the appellant did not deposit the above amount there appeal was subsequently dismissed for non-compliance vide final order No. A/219-223/2012 EX (BR) dated 22/02/12. The said orders were put to challenge by the applicant before the Hon ble High Court of Allahabad, who vid ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... we find that the stay order as also the subsequent order of dismissal of appeals by the Tribunal was the subject matter of the appeal before the Hon ble High Court of Allahabad, when the appeals filed by the applicant stand rejected by the Hon ble Allahabad High Court. Further the said order stand upheld by the Hon ble Supreme Court. Ongoing through the order of the High Court, we find that there ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
