2014 (3) TMI 593

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act - Decided against assessee. - Appeal No. 2617-2618 of 2010 - - - Dated:- 30-1-2013 - Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Mr. Sahab Singh, JJ. For the Appellant: Ms. Sukriti Das, Advocate For the Respondent: Shri R.K. Verma, Authorized Representative (DR) JUDGEMENT Per. Archana Wadhwa:- It is seen that vide stay order No. 1648-49/2011-EX dated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r. As such, the notice was issued to the appellant calling upon on them as to why their appeal should not be dismiss for non-compliance. 3. On matter being called today for ascertaining compliance with the above order learned Advocate Ms. Sukriti Das appearing for the appellant submits that they are challenged the miscellaneous order before the Hon ble Punjab Haryana High Court by filing a wri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X