2014 (4) TMI 330

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ppeal No. 3135-3136 of 2012 - ORDER NO . SO/55435-55436/2013-Ex(Br) - Dated:- 11-1-2013 - Smt. Archana Wadhwa and Shri Sahab Singh, JJ. For the Appellant: Shri B.L. Narasimhan, Advocate For the Respondent: Ms. Ranjana Jha, Jt. CDR ORDER Per Archana Wadhwa (for the Bench): In both the cases, demand stand confirmed against the appellant on the ground that pre-delivery inspe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... onditional stay to the appellant. 3. Apart from relying upon the above subsequent stay order of the Tribunal in their own case, learned advocate also draws our attention to Bombay High Court decision in the case of Tata Motors Ltd. Vs. Union of India [2012 (286) ELT 161 (Bom)] quashing the circular issued by the Board and laying down that such pre-delivery inspection and after sale service charg .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X