9911796707
TMI Blog2010 (2) TMI 1096X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Dated:- 16-2-2010 - RAJES KUMAR AND PANKAJ MITHAL , JJ. Heard Sri Bharatji Agrawal, learned senior advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri U.K. Pandey, learned standing counsel. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated January 20, 2010 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Ghaziabad Zone, Ghaziabad for the assessment years 2003-04 to 2006-07 under the U.P. Tax on Entry of Goods Act (hereinafter referred as the Act ). The contention of the petitioner is that the Additional Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Ghaziabad Zone, Ghaziabad, has issued the notices under section 21(2) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred as, the Trade Tax Act ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f U.P. reported in [2010] 29 VST 107; [2009] UPTC 576. The learned standing counsel states that let the matter be remanded back to the Additional Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Ghaziabad Zone, Ghaziabad to pass fresh order in accordance with law and the limitation should be saved as has been saved in the case of S.K. Traders v. Additional Commissioner, Grade I, Trade Tax, Zone, Ghaziabad [2009] 26 VST 601 (All). We have perused the impugned orders. The impugned orders reveal that the submissions made in the reply have not been considered at all and the approval has been granted mechanically only in the interest of Revenue. Such orders cannot be sustained in the eye of law and are liable to be set aside. In the case of Ramayan Trad ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the above, we set aside the impugned orders passed under section 21(2) of the Trade Tax Act for the assessment years 2003-04 to 2006-07 under the Act and the matters are remanded back to the Additional Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Ghaziabad Zone, Ghaziabad to pass the orders afresh in accordance with law. The Additional Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Ghaziabad Zone, Ghaziabad is directed to consider the submissions made in the reply to the notices. So far as the limitation is concerned, the Division Bench of this court in the case S.K. Traders v. Additional Commissioner, Grade I, Trade Tax, Zone, Ghaziabad [2009] 26 VST 601 (All) held as follows (at page 638): Recently a Division Bench of this court in Civil Misc. Writ Petitio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
