TMI Blog2014 (5) TMI 980X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iled arguments made by both sides need deeper consideration which can be done at the time of final hearing only. For the purpose of stay, duty payment of Rs. 75,31,370/- and interest payment of Rs. 3,33,764/- is considered sufficient for hearing and listing this appeal. Accordingly, it is ordered that there will be stay on recovery of the balance amounts involved till the disposal of this appeal - ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ightly confirmed by the appellant for default in payment of duty under Rule 8 (3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 2. Shri Paritosh Gupta (Advocate) appearing on behalf of the appellant argued that the default has been made good by making a payment of Rs. 75,31,370/- and interest of Rs. 3,33,764/- in cash. The remaining amount of Rs. 64,4 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mited vs. CCE, Indore - [2012 (285) ELT 394 (Tri. Del.)] (ix) Allianz Steel Limited vs. CCE, Indore - [2012 (286) ELT 633 (Tri. Del.)] (x) Bakewell Agro Limited vs. CCE, Meerut - [2014-TIOL-138-CESTAT-DEL. 3. Shri K. Sivakumar (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue argued that as per the provisions of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, the entire duty was required to be paid i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... deeper consideration which can be done at the time of final hearing only. For the purpose of stay, duty payment of Rs. 75,31,370/- and interest payment of Rs. 3,33,764/- is considered sufficient for hearing and listing this appeal. Accordingly, it is ordered that there will be stay on recovery of the balance amounts involved till the disposal of this appeal. (Order pronounced in the Court on 26 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
