TMI Blog2014 (7) TMI 920X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fore the CESTAT, the second respondent should not resort to any coercive action for collection of any amount, till the stay application is disposed of by the CESTAT. Therefore, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the the second respondent not to take any coercive steps for recovering any amount from the petitioners, till the disposal of the stay application by the CESTAT. - Decided in fav ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ional rate of duty. The invoice and agreement with the supplier also describes the coal as 'steaming non-coking coal'. 3. While things stood thus, the second respondent issued a show cause notice, dated 21.05.2013, directing the petitioners to pay the 'differential customs duty' of ₹ 21,80,99,048/- together with interest on the import of 5,00,586 MT of coal valued at ͅ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... application for waiver of pre-deposit under Section 129 E of the Customs Act, 1962 and for stay of the operation of the Order-in-original No.2 of 2014. Pending the stay application, it is stated that the second respondent is taking coercive action to recover the disputed duty and penalty. Hence these writ petitions. 6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that when the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
