Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

PRE DEPOSIT OF PENALTY

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... PRE DEPOSIT OF PENALTY - By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN - Central Excise - Dated:- 1-8-2014 - - Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 provides for deposit of duty or penalty levied, pending appeal. The said section provides that where in any appeal under this Chapter, the decision or order appealed against relates to any duty demanded in respect of goods which are not under the control of c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... entral excise authorities or any penalty levied under this Act, the person desirous of appealing against such decision or order shall, pending the appeal, deposit with the adjudicating authority the duty demanded or the penalty levied. The first proviso to this section provides that where in any particular case, the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal is of opinion that the deposit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of duty demanded or penalty levied would cause undue hardship to such person, the Commissioner (Appeals) or, as the case may be, the Appellate Tribunal, may dispense with such deposit subject to such conditions as he or it may deem fit to impose so as to safeguard the interests of revenue. A question arises whether the deposit as well as the penalty is liable to be deposited pending appeal. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... In Spandana Spoorthy Financial Limited V. Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise Service Tax, Hyderabad 2014 (5) TMI 33 - CESTAT BANGALORE the petitioner filed this writ petition before the High Court challenging the order of the CESTAT, Hyderabad, dated 10.07.2013 by which the Tribunal directed to make pre deposit of the basic tax component as well as 50% of the penalty under Section .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 78 and discrepancy of ₹ 12 lakhs between the petitioner s own assessment of tax liability and the adjudicating authority s determination. The High Court is of the view when the appeal is admitted for hearing and the order of assessment is under scrutiny, unless the order of assessment reaches its finality, the question of initiation of penalty proceedings does not and cannot arise. The H .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... igh Court analyzed the first proviso to the Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The High Court held that it is clear that in view of insertion of the word of the Tribunal cannot ask to make pre deposit in both at a time. According to the High Court the pre deposit of the penalty amount will be required when the order of the penalty alone is under challenge. But if there is a compos .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ite order namely assessment order, tax component and also penalty order like here, direction of pre deposit of any portion of the penalty amount would result in injustice as well as hardship. Under these circumstances the High Court was of the view that the direction for pre deposit of penalty component of the order has to be deleted and is decided and the rest portion of the order would remain. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The High Court further directed the Tribunal to decide the appeal as early as possible preferably within a period of 3 weeks from the date of communication of the order. This principle will also be applicable to the newly proposed substituted Section 35F as per clause 98 of Finance Bill,(No. 2) 2014. The newly substituted Section 35F reads as follows: Sec. 35F . The Tribunal o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the Commissioner (Appeals), as the case may be, shall not entertain any appeal- Under sub-section (1) of Section 35 , unless the appellant has deposited 7.5% of the duty demanded or penalty imposed or both, in pursuance of a decision or an order passed by an officer of Central Excise lower in rank than the Commissioner of Central Excise. Against the decision or order referred to in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... clause (a) of sub section (1) of Section 35B , unless the appellant has deposited 7.5% of the duty demanded or penalty imposed or both , in pursuance of the decision or order appealed against; Against the decision or order referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 35B , unless the appellant has deposited 10% of the duty demanded or penalty imposed or both, in pursuance of the d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ecision or order appealed against: Provided that the amount required to be deposited under this section shall not exceed ₹ 10 crores. As per the order of High Court only duty will be payable at the rate prescribed in the above section and not the penalty. Penalty at the said rate shall be deposited only penalty alone is challenged. Duty and penalty are not liable to be deposited si .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nce as per the High Court s order the when the appeal is admitted for hearing and the order of assessment is under scrutiny, unless the order of assessment reaches its finality, the question of initiation of penalty proceedings does not and cannot arise. As such the words or both shall be deleted from the new section. If the said words are not deleted another question will arise who is to or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... der to deposit both duty and penalty since the appellant may be willing to only duty but not penalty. The Appellate Authority only to decide this issue for which an application is to be filed by the appellant before the authority for the waival of penalty. The views of the experts, in this regard, are solicited. - - Scholarly articles for knowledge sharing authors experts professionals Tax .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Management India - taxmanagementindia - taxmanagement - taxmanagementindia.com - TMI - TaxTMI - TMITax .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates