TMI Blog1974 (9) TMI 109X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... upon hearing the arguments of Mr. K.C. Rajappa, Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order : 2. The petitioner prays for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents, namely, the Asst. Collector of C. Ex., I.D.O. Sivakasi and the Inspector of C.E., Prev. Group. Office of the Collr. of C.E., New Delhi to release the goods and hand over to the petitioner 1000 bun ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ds have been confiscated to the Government. In view of the existence of this order no writ of mandamus can be issued to the respondent directing them to return the goods to the petitioner. Now, two things are clear. One is that the goods themselves have not been seized from the custody of the petitioner and the petitioner himself admits that they were seized at Delhi Lahori Gate railway station, w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|