TMI Blog2014 (8) TMI 888X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... efend the case. In view of that, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh after considering the submission of the appellant. It is made clear that the appellant have not disputed the demand of tax in respect of Sl. Nos. 2, 3 and 4 mentioned in the above Table. The adjudicating authority shall also examine the deposit made by the appellant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... stitutions, software companies and factories etc. A show-cause notice dated 5.10.2010 was issued proposing demand of tax of ₹ 69,38,427/- along with interest and penalty for the period June 2005 to June 2009 on various counts. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of tax along with interest and penalty. 3. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that demand of tax was rais ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 4. Non-payment of service tax on MRS June 2005 to Sept. 2005 Rs.5,959/- (Paid and appropriated) 4. The learned counsel fairly submits that they are not contesting the demand of tax in respect of Sl. Nos. 2, 3 and 4 and they have already paid the tax along with interest. Regarding the demand of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ving any opportunity to the appellant to defend the case. In view of that, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh after considering the submission of the appellant. It is made clear that the appellant have not disputed the demand of tax in respect of Sl. Nos. 2, 3 and 4 mentioned in the above Table. The adjudicating authority shall also ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
