TMI Blog2014 (9) TMI 592X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion to the concerned Revisional Authorities to consider the petitioner's stay petitions, if the same have been properly filed and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The benefit of this order will not enure to the petitioner, if the revision petition is otherwise defective. Adjustment of d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... an Additional Govt. Pleader JUDGEMENT:- The petitioner seeks for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, challenging the demand notice issued under the provisions of Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006 and General Sales Tax Act, 1956. The demand has been made on the following terms: Sl. No. Months TIN Rs. C.S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ,70,326 3,05,954 15,76,280 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would fairly state that so far as serial Nos.1 and 2 are concerned, the petitioner dealer will pay the amount demanded. Therefore, as against serial Nos.1 and 2, challenge become infructuous and the petitioner is granted 30 days time to pay the amount. Insofar as serial Nos.3 and 4 a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . The benefit of this order will not enure to the petitioner, if the revision petition is otherwise defective. Insofar as the demand in serial No.5 is concerned, the petitioner would state that there is a valid refund claim. However, this has to be adjudicated and the petitioner has to move the appropriate authority pursuing his application and thereafter, seek for stay of the demand. Therefore, t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
