TMI Blog2014 (11) TMI 24X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to the applicant on execution of bank guarantee of ₹ 60,00,000/- for repair purpose only. Now the applicant wants to take the vessel outside Indian Territory for the commercial purpose. Considering the fact that the differential duty is around ₹ 6 crore which is in dispute therefore, for fair consideration of the request of the applicant and to safeguard the interest of the Revenue, we ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the same is taken up for consideration today itself therefore, the early hearing application has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous. 2. The miscellaneous application filed by the applicant is for directing the respondent to permit the applicant to take the vessel in question out of India for operational purpose. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the applicant brou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e applicant and vide stay order No. S/925/13/CSTB/C-I dated 25.06.2013 and considering the fact that out of total demand of ₹ 10,86,40,641/- the applicant had paid ₹ 4.14 crores during the course of investigation and the same is sufficient in compliance with the provisions of Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, granted waiver of pre-deposit of balance amount of the duty, interest an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ition No. 1070/13 vide dated 25.11.2013. The extension was granted till 30.12.2013. The vessel was brought back in Indian Territory by the said date. As the appeal of the applicant has not been heard by this Tribunal till date and the applicant wants to take the vessel outside Indian Territory for their commercial purpose, the applicant moved this miscellaneous application seeking permission to ta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
