TMI Blog2014 (11) TMI 776X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... T AHMEDABAD [2013 (4) TMI 382 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD] on following questions of Law:- Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CESTAT was justified in holding that Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could not have been invoked and applied by the Revenue and the applicable provision was Rule 27 of the said Rules? Whether the CESTAT was right in placing reliance u ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... stantial questions of law :- (a) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CESTAT was justified in holding that Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 could not have been invoked and applied by the Revenue and the applicable provision was Rule 27 of the said Rules? (b) Whether the CESTAT was right in placing reliance upon the order passed by the CESTAT i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
