2013 (4) TMI 694

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ri C.B. Tripathi, Special Counsel for the State of U.P., Respondent. 2. The petitioner is a proprietorship concern and is duly registered under the provisions of U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. It is engaged in trading jute yarn/sutali etc. The dispute relates to the Assessment Year 2002-2003 (U.P.). 3. By means of the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 21st of August, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ugned order would show that it does not contain any reason for granting the sanction. Time and again, this Court has held that the reasons may be in brief, should be recorded before granting sanction under the proviso to Section 21(2) of the Act. Reference can be made to S.K. Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, 2008 UPTC 392. 7. We therefore, while setting aside the impugned order, provide tha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X