2011 (1) TMI 1307

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... APPEAL NO. 4843 OF 2007, IA Nos. 2-3 in CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4844 OF 2007 - - - Dated:- 11-1-2011 - HARJIT SINGH BEDI AND CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, JJ. FOR THE PETITIONER : MR. M. K. GARG FOR THE RESPONDENT : M/S. J. S. WAD CO. ORDER 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. 2. 241 kanals of land was acquired for the benefit of the applicant. As per the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cquisition and departmental charges and approximately ₹ 11,00,000/- towards super structure charges. We are of the opinion that the deduction of these amounts is totally unjustified for the reason that the State Government had issued a faulty notification for acquisition which has been quashed by this Court and the beneficiary applicant had no role to play in its issuance. We, therefore, fee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X