TMI Blog2014 (8) TMI 979X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... interference with such discretionary order. However, considering the consequences for non-compliance of the conditions imposed in the impugned order, this Court extends the time for deposit of 25% of the duty imposed upon the petitioner till four weeks from date. - Decided conditionally in favour of assessee. - W.P. No. 4532 (W) of 2014 - - - Dated:- 4-8-2014 - Harish Tandon, J. Shri Shov ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etitioner, certain transactions, which does not attract the liability towards the Service Tax, were not taken note of by the authorities and the imposition of the demand is illegal and outcome of non-application of mind. 4. The petitioner challenged the order imposing the demand before the appellate authority wherein an application for stay is taken out. The appellate authority after considerin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that the Tribunal did not take note of the financial conditions, which is one of the facets for granting the waiver. The Tribunal records that the adjudicating authority took into consideration the benefit claimed by the assessee and the purchasers in relation to the work order and extended the benefit to the petitioner. It is further recorded that the work order, which is relatable to the Service ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
