TMI Blog2013 (6) TMI 745X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... A No.4038/Mum/2013 , ITA No.4040/Mum/2013 , ITA No.4037/Mum/2013 , ITA No.4041/Mum/2013 , ITA No.4035/Mum/2013 , ITA No.4036/Mum/2013 ,S.A.No.167/Mum/2013 , S.A.No.168/Mum/2013 , S.A.No.169/Mum/2013 , S.A.No.170/Mum/2013 , S.A.No.171/Mum/2013 , S.A.No.172/Mum/2013 Shri B.R.Mittal(Judicial Member) And Shri D. Karunakar Rao, Accountant Member For the Appellant : S/Shri S.E.Dastur, Madhur ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iod of 6 months. The said appeals are fixed for hearing on 14.8.2013. The ld. AR filed a copy of the said order of the Tribunal dated 24.5.2013 to substantiate his submissions. 4. The ld. DR did not dispute the above facts, save and accept submitting that the assessee should be asked to pay some demand. 5. We have carefully considered the submissions of the ld. Representatives of the parties ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . 523 of 2013, vide judgment dated 6th March 2013, and also in the similar W.P., vide judgment dated 14th March 2012, are still applicable and relevant in case of the assessee even after passing of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) s order. Therefore, in the interest of justice, we are of the considered opinion that this is a fit case for grant of stay. Consequently, we order as under: i) T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... stry to fix the appeals under consideration being ITA Nos.4035, 4036, 4037, 4038, 4040, 4041/Mum/2013 on 14.8.2013 before the Regular I Bench. Since above date was indicated after hearing of the stay applications in the presence of the representative of both the parties, it was indicated that no notice of date of hearing would be sent. 7. In the results, all the stay applications of the asses ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
