TMI Blog2007 (3) TMI 749X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... llant along with Shri Manoj Kumar Kain, is present. On behalf of the Respondent, the following are present:- (i) Shri V.K. Lagan, Dir (Estt) (ii) Shri A.K. Gupta, US The brief facts of the case are as under. 2. The Appellant had, in his application dated 6 March 2007, requested the CPIO for a large number of information on the action taken by the authorities on a number of represent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the CIC in second appeal against the order of the Appellate Authority as conveyed by the CPIO. 3. During the hearing, both the parties made several submissions. The Appellant was specially concerned that the Public Authority did not maintain records filed by citizens as expected under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. He referred to his own representations made to various authorities in the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... llant to the Ministry or to any other authority which got transferred to the Ministry had been destroyed/weeded out following the retention schedule. We also direct the CPIO to provide copies of the file notings of the file in which the joint memorandum of January 2007 had been processed (item 4 of the application). 5. The Appellant drew our attention to the fact that the RTI applicants had bee ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
